Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1707
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForrest, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-22T14:02:00Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationAnalysis, 64(284), p. 358-362en
dc.identifier.issn1467-8284en
dc.identifier.issn0003-2638en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1707-
dc.description.abstractIn 'How do we know it is now now?' David Braddon-Mitchell (2004) develops an objection to No Futurism (also known as the Growing Block theory) that the past is real but the future is not. He notes my response to this, namely that the past, although real, is lifeless and (a fortiori?) lacking in sentience. He argues, however, that this response, which I call the Past is Dead hypothesis is not tenable if combined with Special Relativity.My purpose in this reply is to argue that, on the contrary, Special Relativity supports No Futurism or Presentism at the expense of the Parmeidean position that past and future are both real.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofAnalysisen
dc.titleThe real but dead past: a reply to Braddon-Mitchellen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0003-2638.2004.00510.xen
dc.subject.keywordsPhilosophyen
local.contributor.firstnamePeteren
local.subject.for2008220399 Philosophy not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo780199 Non-Oriented Research Non-oriented Research Otheren
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailpforrest@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:1699en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage358en
local.format.endpage362en
local.identifier.scopusid60949378425en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume64en
local.identifier.issue284en
local.title.subtitlea reply to Braddon-Mitchellen
local.contributor.lastnameForresten
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pforresten
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1766en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe real but dead pasten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorForrest, Peteren
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2004en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

90
checked on Sep 28, 2024

Page view(s)

1,210
checked on May 5, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.