1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Journal Article
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1645
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGifford, Ren
dc.contributor.authorHine, Donald Williamen
dc.contributor.authorMuller-Clemm, Wen
dc.contributor.authorShaw, KTen
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-20T16:54:00Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19(2), p. 131-148en
dc.identifier.issn0738-0895en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1645-
dc.description.abstractArchitects and laypersons experience buildings quite differently; this study investigated the physical and cognitive underpinnings of these differences. Laypersons and practicing architects assessed the global aesthetic quality and six key cognitive properties (complexity, clarity, friendliness, originality, meaningfulness, and ruggedness) of 42 large contemporary buildings, and 59 physical features of each building were independently scored. Lens model analyses revealed how these physical features are interpreted differently by the two groups, which apparently leads them to experience different cognitive properties, which in turn leads to different aesthetic conclusions. However, the results also suggest how architects and laypersons might better understand each other.en
dc.description.tableofcontentshttp://japr.homestead.com/files/TOC192.PDFen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLocke Science Publishing Company Incen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Architectural and Planning Researchen
dc.titleWhy Architects and Laypersons Judge Buildings Differently: Cognitive Properties and Physical Basesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsSensory Processes, Perception and Performanceen
local.contributor.firstnameRen
local.contributor.firstnameDonald Williamen
local.contributor.firstnameWen
local.contributor.firstnameKTen
local.subject.for2008170112 Sensory Processes, Perception and Performanceen
local.subject.seo780108 Behavioural and cognitive sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.emaildhine@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:222en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage131en
local.format.endpage148en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume19en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitleCognitive Properties and Physical Basesen
local.contributor.lastnameGifforden
local.contributor.lastnameHineen
local.contributor.lastnameMuller-Clemmen
local.contributor.lastnameShawen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dhineen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-3905-7026en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1704en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleWhy Architects and Laypersons Judge Buildings Differentlyen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttp://web.uvic.ca/psyc/gifford/pdf/Why%20architects%20and%20laypersons%20judge%20buildings%20differently%20Cognitive%20and%20physical%20bases%20(2002).pdfen
local.search.authorGifford, Ren
local.search.authorHine, Donald Williamen
local.search.authorMuller-Clemm, Wen
local.search.authorShaw, KTen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2002en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,252
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.