Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15489
Title: Case Comment: Eldred v. Ashcroft
Contributor(s): Forrest, Heather (author)
Publication Date: 2003
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15489
Abstract: Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 gives Congress the power "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." Courts throughout American history have referred to this passage to justify their decisions to grant or deny protection to a particular invention or work of original expression. The January 15, 2003 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Eldred v. Ashcroft reinforces and relies upon this fundamental grant of authority. Critics argue that the decision fails to consider the economic implications of a retroactive application of the twenty year extension of copyright term granted under the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act. The truth is, the majority's decision does fail to take such economic considerations into account, and rightfully so.
Publication Type: Review
Source of Publication: Intellectual Property Today (November), p. 38-39
Publisher: Omega Communications
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1521-7256
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 180115 Intellectual Property Law
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: D4 Any Other Published Review
Publisher/associated links: http://www.iptoday.com/archive.asp
Appears in Collections:Review

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

2,190
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.