Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14945
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClayton, Jimen
dc.contributor.authorPavey, Chris Ren
dc.contributor.authorVernes, Karl Aen
dc.contributor.authorTighe, Matthewen
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-02T11:09:00Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationMammal Review, 44(2), p. 109-123en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2907en
dc.identifier.issn0305-1838en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14945-
dc.description.abstract1. Translocations have become an increasingly popular tool in threatened macropod conservation in Australia. Although previous evaluations of Australian macropod translocations have been published, the number of contemporary translocation programmes awaiting analysis, and new data regarding historic translocations, required a new assessment of macropod translocation programmes. 2. We aimed to assess trends in the way macropod translocations were conducted during the period 1969-2006, determine the number of successful translocations and identify factors common to successful translocations. 3. Data regarding macropod translocations were obtained from a wide variety of sources, including peer-reviewed journals, 'grey' literature and popular interest publications. Questionnaires were also sent to translocation managers to acquire detailed information. Specific aspects of macropod translocation methodology were analysed, and classification tree analysis was conducted to identify methodological and environmental factors common to successful translocations. 4. We identified 109 macropod translocations for which sufficient data could be collected to permit analysis. Using the presence of a population on 1 January 2007 as a simple criterion, 61% of translocations were successful. Of these translocations, 66% were also considered successful by Short et al.'s criteria (population persisted for five years and is deemed likely to continue to persist); the remainder could not be assessed due to lack of data or insufficient elapsed time since release. Classification tree analysis suggested methodological and environmental factors common to successful translocations; the overriding factor determining success was the absence of cats and foxes at the release site. 5. Although Australian macropod translocation proponents are faced with myriad methodological options when designing a translocation protocol, the primary consideration should be whether or not cats or foxes are present at the release site. Managers should be aware that there may be no safe population level of such predators for some translocation candidate species. Ignoring this fact will inevitably lead to a repeat of past translocation failures.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofMammal Reviewen
dc.titleReview and analysis of Australian macropod translocations 1969-2006en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/mam.12020en
dc.subject.keywordsWildlife and Habitat Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsConservation and Biodiversityen
local.contributor.firstnameJimen
local.contributor.firstnameChris Ren
local.contributor.firstnameKarl Aen
local.contributor.firstnameMatthewen
local.subject.for2008050202 Conservation and Biodiversityen
local.subject.for2008050211 Wildlife and Habitat Managementen
local.subject.for2008050205 Environmental Managementen
local.subject.seo2008960501 Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scalesen
local.subject.seo2008960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scalesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailkvernes@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmtighe2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140307-154414en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage109en
local.format.endpage123en
local.identifier.scopusid84896831291en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume44en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameClaytonen
local.contributor.lastnamePaveyen
local.contributor.lastnameVernesen
local.contributor.lastnameTigheen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jclayto2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cpaveyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kvernesen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mtighe2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1635-9950en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:15160en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14945en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleReview and analysis of Australian macropod translocations 1969-2006en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorClayton, Jimen
local.search.authorPavey, Chris Ren
local.search.authorVernes, Karl Aen
local.search.authorTighe, Matthewen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000332151000004en
local.year.published2014en
local.subject.for2020410401 Conservation and biodiversityen
local.subject.for2020410407 Wildlife and habitat managementen
local.subject.for2020410404 Environmental managementen
local.subject.seo2020180403 Assessment and management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean ecosystemsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.