Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14584
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiljeblad, Jonathanen
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-07T12:21:00Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationHastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 19(2), p. 231-246en
dc.identifier.issn1080-0735en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14584en
dc.description.abstractProtected areas have increasingly become a policy tool in biodiversity conservation. The popularity of these areas is reflected by increases in both the absolute number and geographic extent of the protection granted. In implementing policy, modern protected areas have turned to adaptive co-management strategies to resolve frequent issues between environmental welfare and human interests. Adaptive co-management is perceived as an effective policy strategy to resolve such problems in that it appears to allow a greater degree of procedural justice by calling for greater participation by local communities in policy decisions, thereby enabling a greater likelihood for distributive justice in locating nature-human interdependencies responsive to diverse affected interests. This discussion, however, posits that adaptive co-management as a policy strategy is flawed because its inherent dynamic destabilizes its capacity to resolve potential conflicts between protected areas and local communities. This paper construes such situations epistemologically, asserting that the dynamic of adaptive co-management extends beyond law and policy to an essential normative conflict. Hence, the adaptive co-management model should be viewed as a normative subject requiring a normative analysis.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherHastings College of the Law, University of Californiaen
dc.relation.ispartofHastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policyen
dc.titleAdaptive Co-Management Thresholds: Understanding Protected Areas Policy as Normative Conflicten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental and Natural Resources Lawen
local.contributor.firstnameJonathanen
local.subject.for2008180111 Environmental and Natural Resources Lawen
local.subject.seo2008949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailjonathan.liljeblad@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC2en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140321-122752en
local.publisher.placeSan Francisco, United States of Americaen
local.format.startpage231en
local.format.endpage246en
local.identifier.volume19en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitleUnderstanding Protected Areas Policy as Normative Conflicten
local.contributor.lastnameLiljebladen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jliljeblen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:14799en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14584en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAdaptive Co-Management Thresholdsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC2 Non-Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.description.statisticsepubsVisitors: 130<br />Views: 131<br />Downloads: 0en
local.search.authorLiljeblad, Jonathanen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

108
checked on May 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.