Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12997
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Scott, Fiona | en |
dc.contributor.author | Cacho, Oscar J | en |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, Jim M | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-17T16:18:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Animal Production Science, 53(7-8), p. 788-795 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1836-5787 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1836-0939 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12997 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Cicerone farmlet experiment, conducted on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia, explored aspects of profitability and sustainability under three different whole-farmlet management regimes. The 5-year period over which the treatments were measured occurred over a period of generally below-average rainfall, hence responses to management treatments were limited. A modelling approach was used to estimate profitability over a longer period representing the variable climate of the region. A stochastic discounted cash flow model was developed to estimate economic returns of two of the Cicerone management system treatments scaled up from the farmlet scale (53 ha) to the size of a typical commercial farm in the region (920 ha) over a 20-year period. Several scenarios were used to estimate the commercial-scale returns under different rates of pasture improvement and stocking rates. Over the long-term, Farm A was found to be more profitable but also more risky (in terms of variation around the mean of cumulative discounted cash flow) than the 'typical' Farm B management system. If livestock managers choose to adopt a pasture improvement strategy based on renovating pastures and increasing soil fertility, they are more likely to achieve higher net worth with more moderate rates of pasture improvement than those explored on Farm A where a high rate of pasture improvement had been implemented in order to quickly differentiate treatments. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | CSIRO Publishing | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Animal Production Science | en |
dc.title | Economic risk analysis of different livestock management systems | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1071/AN11249 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Gold | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Agricultural Economics | en |
dc.subject.keywords | Farming Systems Research | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Fiona | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Oscar J | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Jim M | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 140201 Agricultural Economics | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 070107 Farming Systems Research | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 830399 Livestock Raising not elsewhere classified | en |
local.profile.school | UNE Business School | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | fiona.scott@industry.nsw.gov.au | en |
local.profile.email | ocacho@une.edu.au | en |
local.profile.email | jscott@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.identifier.epublicationsrecord | une-20130717-093846 | en |
local.publisher.place | Australia | en |
local.format.startpage | 788 | en |
local.format.endpage | 795 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 84884573559 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 53 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 7-8 | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Scott | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Cacho | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Scott | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:jscott43 | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:ocacho | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:jscott | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0002-1542-4442 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:13206 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Economic risk analysis of different livestock management systems | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Scott, Fiona | en |
local.search.author | Cacho, Oscar J | en |
local.search.author | Scott, Jim M | en |
local.uneassociation | Unknown | en |
local.year.published | 2013 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 380101 Agricultural economics | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 300208 Farm management, rural management and agribusiness | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 150510 Production | en |
local.codeupdate.date | 2021-12-21T14:20:47.831 | en |
local.codeupdate.eperson | ocacho@une.edu.au | en |
local.codeupdate.finalised | true | en |
local.original.for2020 | 380101 Agricultural economics | en |
local.original.for2020 | undefined | en |
local.original.seo2020 | undefined | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
1,228
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.