Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12774
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhalley, Ralph Den
dc.contributor.authorChivers, Ian Hen
dc.contributor.authorWaters, Cathy Men
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-24T17:27:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationThe Rangeland Journal, 35(2), p. 155-166en
dc.identifier.issn1834-7541en
dc.identifier.issn1036-9872en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12774-
dc.description.abstractMany restoration guidelines strongly recommend the use of local sources of seed in native plant revegetation projects. These recommendations are based on assumptions that the species used for revegetation are cross-pollinated and woody, as they were developed for overstorey vegetation from the northern hemisphere. Their validity is challenged with respect to replacing or enhancing the native Australian grass component of degraded ecosystems. First, far from being the dominant pollination mechanism, obligatory cross-pollination has not been recorded in any Australian native grasses except for a few dioecious species. Indeed, the common Australian native grasses so far studied have revealed complicated breeding systems that provide the evolutionary resilience necessary for coping with the variable Australian climate as well as with future climate change. It is suggested that a key feature of this flexibility is polyploidy and its implications for sourcing seed are discussed. Second, it is argued that the genetic dissimilarity among populations of a species is not proportional to the distance between them but is more related to the environmental stresses that have been placed on those populations in the past. This is illustrated by different scales of ecotypic variation that are often trait-dependent. Evidence for this can be found in several translocation experiments, where populations of native grasses from a great distance away survive and often perform better than local populations. It is concluded that there is little justification for the recommendation that only local sources of seed of Australian native grasses should be used for revegetation projects, and particularly in large-scale programs. Instead, it is argued that studies on Australian native grasses provide clear evidence that distinct adaptive advantages may be gained by sourcing non-local provenance seed, which is matched to the environment of the revegetation site, and which contains appropriate stress tolerance genes, or by mixing populations from several locations to increase the genetic diversity of seed sources. Some general guidelines are provided for deciding whether or not to use local provenances depending on the purpose of the revegetation, the degree of environmental modification of the site and the characteristics of the species of choice.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Rangeland Journalen
dc.titleRevegetation with Australian native grasses - a reassessment of the importance of using local provenancesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/RJ12078en
dc.subject.keywordsTerrestrial Ecologyen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Education and Extensionen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Rehabilitation (excl Bioremediation)en
local.contributor.firstnameRalph Den
local.contributor.firstnameIan Hen
local.contributor.firstnameCathy Men
local.subject.for2008060208 Terrestrial Ecologyen
local.subject.for2008050203 Environmental Education and Extensionen
local.subject.for2008050207 Environmental Rehabilitation (excl Bioremediation)en
local.subject.seo2008960811 Sparseland, Permanent Grassland and Arid Zone Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.subject.seo2008960508 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Mining Environmentsen
local.subject.seo2008960809 Mining Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolBotanyen
local.profile.schoolBotanyen
local.profile.emailrwhalley@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailian@nativeseeds.com.auen
local.profile.emailcathy.waters@industry.nsw.gov.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20130621-102057en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage155en
local.format.endpage166en
local.identifier.scopusid84879920216en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume35en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameWhalleyen
local.contributor.lastnameChiversen
local.contributor.lastnameWatersen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rwhalleyen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-2949-9891en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:12982en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleRevegetation with Australian native grasses - a reassessment of the importance of using local provenancesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWhalley, Ralph Den
local.search.authorChivers, Ian Hen
local.search.authorWaters, Cathy Men
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2013en
local.subject.for2020310308 Terrestrial ecologyen
local.subject.for2020410403 Environmental education and extensionen
local.subject.for2020410405 Environmental rehabilitation and restorationen
local.subject.seo2020180606 Terrestrial biodiversityen
local.subject.seo2020180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystemsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.