Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/119
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, GRen
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-02T17:06:00Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Economics, 51(3-4), p. 271-286en
dc.identifier.issn1873-6106en
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/119-
dc.description.abstractThe track record of community-based programs of natural resources governance in implementing the plans they have developed has been patchy at best. In particular, hopes that farmers' participation in decision-making within such programs would lead them to cooperate more voluntarily in implementing agreed solutions are frequently not realised. This article seeks to enhance implementation capacities in such community-based programs by furthering our empirical understanding of the factors affecting farmers' preparedness to cooperate in providing the kinds of collective goods with which these programs are typically concerned. The particular case studied concerns farmers in a major irrigated region of the Murray-Darling Basin in Australia faced with rising watertables and consequent worsening problems of irrigation salinity and waterlogging. Their jointly owned irrigation company—a common property regime—has been devolved rights and responsibilities for enforcing implementation of plans for collective action solving these problems that the farmers have helped develop and agreed to carry out. The empirical analysis involved ordered-probit multiple regression using data obtained from a face-to-face survey of 235 farm businesses. A key finding is that the farmers' preparedness to cooperate in implementing the agreed plans is more sensitive to socially oriented factors like perceptions of community benefits, and trust that others will also cooperate, than it is to the private materialistic considerations—like distributive fairness and business security—typically focused upon by governments in attempting to motivate farmer cooperation. Since it is not at all obvious that the costs of satisfying farmers' demands for business security or distributive fairness are less than that of promoting their trust in others, or their awareness of community benefits from conservation activities, it seems reasonable to suggest that these more socially oriented factors should be taken more seriously in designing and implementing programs of natural resources governance than has normally been the case to date.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Economicsen
dc.titleFarmers cooperating in the commons?: A study of collective action in salinity managementen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.016en
dc.subject.keywordsNatural Resource Managementen
local.contributor.firstnameGRen
local.subject.for2008050209 Natural Resource Managementen
local.subject.seo770807 Rehabilitation of degraded farmlanden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailgmarshal@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:1621en
local.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
local.format.startpage271en
local.format.endpage286en
local.identifier.scopusid9444239307en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume51en
local.identifier.issue3-4en
local.title.subtitleA study of collective action in salinity managementen
local.contributor.lastnameMarshallen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gmarshalen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:118en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleFarmers cooperating in the commons?en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMarshall, GRen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000225758200009en
local.year.published2004en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.