Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11457
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Jacquelineen
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Amanda Len
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-17T08:55:00Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Environmental Law at a Crossroads: 10th Annual Colloquium of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Academy of Environmental Law Presentationsen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11457-
dc.description.abstractBest practice commercial management involves two distinct mindsets, harnessed for separate purposes. The innovative mindset is concerned with the creative side of enterprise - entrepreneurship, innovation, strategising and commercialisation). However this is also married to a more pessimistic mindset focused on the identification and avoidance of what might go wrong- (risk management). The modernist paradigm for environmental governance stresses scientific model-based estimation to determine resource use-limits, legally specified property rights to fractions of the environment, market or market like mechanisms for allocation of interests, and scientific methods of performance of the strategies. These elements exist in varying forms regardless of whether the instruments are market-like (eg government incentives based on auctions), full market (eg cap and trade), or hybrids (eg eco-services valuation based payments). There is ample evidence of the innovative and entrepreneurial mindset dominating the narrative about market-oriented governance, with negligible evidence of risk-focused thinking. This is lopsided and dangerous policy-making, that falls well short of the private sector standards that are lauded as the basis for the modernist paradigm. There is also ample evidence that all forms of instrument, no less market-oriented instruments, often fail in practice. The risks are not theoretical, they are real and the adverse consequences are well-demonstrated in practice. This paper is intended to provide a carefully developed framework, supported by empirical evidence, to provide a framework for risk-assessment of potential market instruments. As in the commercial world, the application of this less utopian view of innovation is not Luddism, it is intended to strengthen that innovation itself, by ensuring that risks are not ignored but are managed. The paper will consider the following aspects of risk with economic instruments including eco-system services approaches, illustrated empirically by Australian examples.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherEdward Elgaren
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Environmental Law at a Crossroads: 10th Annual Colloquium of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Academy of Environmental Law Presentationsen
dc.titleThe Emerging Institutional Risks from Widespread Adoption of an Ecosystem Services Market Approach to Environmental Governanceen
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceIUCN 2012: 10th Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law: "Global Environmental Law at a Crossroads"en
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental and Natural Resources Lawen
local.contributor.firstnamePaulen
local.contributor.firstnameJacquelineen
local.contributor.firstnameAmanda Len
local.subject.for2008180111 Environmental and Natural Resources Lawen
local.subject.seo2008960799 Environmental Policy, Legislation and Standards not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.schoolInstitute for Rural Futuresen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailpmartin9@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjwilli53@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailakenne21@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE2en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20120919-132841en
local.date.conference1st - 5th July, 2012en
local.conference.placeBaltimore, United States of Americaen
local.publisher.placeCheltenham, United Kingdomen
local.contributor.lastnameMartinen
local.contributor.lastnameWilliamsen
local.contributor.lastnameKennedyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pmartin9en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jwilli53en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:akenne21en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0243-2654en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-6487-8010en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:11656en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe Emerging Institutional Risks from Widespread Adoption of an Ecosystem Services Market Approach to Environmental Governanceen
local.output.categorydescriptionE2 Non-Refereed Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.relation.urlhttp://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/gelc/2012/june30/6/en
local.conference.detailsIUCN 2012: 10th Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law: "Global Environmental Law at a Crossroads", Baltimore, United States of America, 1st - 5th July, 2012en
local.search.authorMartin, Paulen
local.search.authorWilliams, Jacquelineen
local.search.authorKennedy, Amanda Len
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.conference.venueUniversity of Marylanden
local.year.published2012en
local.subject.for2020480203 Environmental lawen
local.subject.for2020480204 Mining, energy and natural resources lawen
local.subject.for2020480202 Climate change lawen
local.subject.seo2020190299 Environmental policy, legislation and standards not elsewhere classifieden
local.date.start2012-07-01-
local.date.end2012-07-05-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
School of Law
Files in This Item:
4 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,468
checked on Apr 7, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.