1. Research UNE
  2. UNE
  3. Conference Publication
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10902
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCallingham, Rosemary Anneen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Leicha Bragg, Coral Campbell, Georgina Herbert, Judith Mousleyen
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-02T11:56:00Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationMERINO: Mathematics Education Research: Innovation, Networking, Opportunity. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, v.1, p. 183-190en
dc.identifier.isbn1920846034en
dc.identifier.isbn1920846018en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10902-
dc.description.abstractThe same group of Year 10 students undertook three different mathematics assessments. Two of these were based on developmental continua and addressed higher order thinking, but in different ways. The third was a multiple-choice test of mathematical skills and knowledge, appropriate to the Year 10 cohort. Results suggested that although all the assessments were reliable, and no test bias was detected, there were some differences between the assessment outcomes across subgroups and by mathematics course being followed. The implications of these findings for teachers and test developers are discussed.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA)en
dc.relation.ispartofMERINO: Mathematics Education Research: Innovation, Networking, Opportunity. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasiaen
dc.titleA Comparison Among Three Different Approaches to Mathematics Assessmenten
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceMERGA 26: 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasiaen
dc.subject.keywordsSpecialist Studies in Educationen
local.contributor.firstnameRosemary Anneen
local.subject.for2008130399 Specialist Studies in Education not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008930301 Assessment and Evaluation of Curriculumen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emailrcalling@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:827en
local.date.conference6th - 10th July, 2003en
local.conference.placeGeelong, Australiaen
local.publisher.placeMelbourne, Australiaen
local.format.startpage183en
local.format.endpage190en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume1en
local.contributor.lastnameCallinghamen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rcallingen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:11098en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleA Comparison Among Three Different Approaches to Mathematics Assessmenten
local.output.categorydescriptionE1 Refereed Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.merga.net.au/documents/RR_callingham.pdfen
local.conference.detailsMERGA 26: 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Geelong, Australia, 6th - 10th July, 2003en
local.search.authorCallingham, Rosemary Anneen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2003en
local.date.start2003-07-06-
local.date.end2003-07-10-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,176
checked on Sep 17, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.