Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/993
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarrington, Ken
local.source.editorEditor(s): Sharon Pickering, Leanne Weberen
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-24T16:15:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationBorders, Mobility and Technologies of Control, p. 179-206en
dc.identifier.isbn140204898Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/993-
dc.description.abstractThe principles of enclosure within borders and the segregation of populations who belong from those who do not are the foundations of the sovereignty of the modern state as the introduction to this volume rightly points out. Border control measures deployed in the neo-colonial antipodes that arise from such conceptions of territorial sovereignty and statism consequently bear many similarities to the disciplinary technologies of population control used around the world as a device for assigning citizens to competing nation states and expelling those who do not otherwise belong. In an increasingly troubled 21st century, destination countries like Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia have increasingly intensified their efforts to tighten their borders, to assert their sovereignty and expel 'non-citizens'. In this respect Australia has emulated the border protection practices of the United States and the United Kingdom, as other contributions to this compendium have suggested. But not in every respect. In some senses Australia has the dubious honour of leading the world, rather than vice versa, through border protection measures and technologies aimed historically at 'white' nation building and protecting the continent's pristine environment against contagion and decease that afflict the northern hemisphere. Unlike Europe and Britain as an immigrant settler nation Australia has been a significant destination country for millions of migrants, albeit mostly from the Anglophone world. All this means that border control measures in the neo colonial antipodes also have a more extended and complicated genealogy historically distinctive from the cross-border issues that regularly arise in the northern hemisphere.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofBorders, Mobility and Technologies of Controlen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleLaw and Order on the Border in the Neo-Colonial Antipodesen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsSociologyen
local.contributor.firstnameKen
local.subject.for2008160899 Sociology not elsewhere classifieden
local.identifier.epublicationsvtls086501973en
local.subject.seo780107 Studies in human societyen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emailkcarring@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:3265en
local.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
local.identifier.totalchapters11en
local.format.startpage179en
local.format.endpage206en
local.contributor.lastnameCarringtonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kcarringen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1011en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleLaw and Order on the Border in the Neo-Colonial Antipodesen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://trove.nla.gov.au/work/19802152en
local.relation.urlhttp://books.google.com.au/books?id=Xpx0knB6cKUCen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.springer.com/social+sciences/criminology/book/978-1-4020-4898-2en
local.search.authorCarrington, Ken
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2006en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,120
checked on Apr 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.