Sharks and the Australian Imaginary

Abstract

As scientists increasingly acknowledge, public perceptions and opinions are crucial to the success or failure of conservation measures. From the preservation of whole river systems, forests and bushland, mangroves and wetlands to individual animal and plant species, the (enforceable) legislation required depends on public support, and thus, whatever the importance and authority of scientific data available, on popular understanding and beliefs. Not surprisingly, therefore, while the conservation of charismatic mega fauna attracts sympathy and support, it is much more difficult to win campaigns for the long-term preservation of habitats (such as eel-grass beds or plankton nurseries) on which the survival of endangered species often depends. Sharks are certainly seen as mega fauna, but they are charismatic in a very different sense from that of whales, dolphins or even tigers, and particular species such as the 'Grey Nurse' ('Eugomphodus taurus') and the 'Great White' ('Carchardon carcharias') are now doubly imperilled by pollution, habitat encroachment and because of popular beliefs about the dangers they pose. Humans worldwide may certainly be in awe of some sharks, admiring their persistence in time, their power, speed and streamlined 'design', but more usually sharks are feared, vilified and slaughtered in almost unimaginable numbers.