Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2468
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrunckhorst, David Johnen
dc.contributor.authorReeve, Ianen
dc.contributor.authorMorley, Philipen
dc.contributor.authorBock, Karlen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Christopher Pettit, William Cartwright, Ian Bishop, Kim Lowell, David Pullar, and David Duncanen
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-12T15:46:00Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationLandscape analysis and visualisation: Spatial models for natural resource management and planning, p. 253-275en
dc.identifier.isbn9783540691679en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2468-
dc.description.abstractAround the world, an increasing number of governments face rising social and environmental costs of resource use. There is increasing understanding amongst both scientists and policy makers that many resource governance issues relate to the complex interdependencies of social and ecological systems operating at various scales. The emergent patterns and properties from social-ecological interactions across landscapes provide further evidence supporting the growing emphasis on efficient and effective community engagement and civic action at multiple scales (Beckley 1995; Berkes and Folke 1998; Brown and MacLeod 1996; Brunckhorst 2000; Slocombe 1993). Planning for resource management at multiple scales of biophysically similar landscapes or ecoregions is considered important because they reflect characteristics influencing land and other resource use (Bailey 1996; Omernik 1987, 1995). Federated or nested administrative arrangements and spatial planning units have been employed by various governments in natural resource management (Frey and Eichenberger 1999; McGinnis, 1999; Waldo 1984). However, these arrangements have not always been effective in ensuring natural resources are used sustainably (Barham 2001; Blomquist and Schlager 2005; Carpenter and Gunderson 2001; Johnson et al. 1999). The placement of boundaries to define regions for integrated resource governance warrants more careful analysis than it has been accorded in the past. What actors with an interest exist in an area, what spatial civic representation and networks, and what landscapes of ecological patterns, function and ecosystem services are included in a resource governance region? These considerations are vitally important to the success or failure of strategies, plans and actions towards more resilient and sustainable social-ecological systems. We put forward three basic principles that need to be considered in defining resource governance regions and, using the State of New South Wales in Australia, demonstrate an empirical method of deriving a nested hierarchy of such regions that are consistent with these principles.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape analysis and visualisation: Spatial models for natural resource management and planningen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleStrategic spatial governance: Deriving social-ecological frameworks for managing landscapes and regionsen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsNatural Resource Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsSustainable Agricultural Developmenten
local.contributor.firstnameDavid Johnen
local.contributor.firstnameIanen
local.contributor.firstnamePhilipen
local.contributor.firstnameKarlen
local.subject.for2008050209 Natural Resource Managementen
local.subject.for2008070108 Sustainable Agricultural Developmenten
local.subject.seo2008960605 Institutional Arrangements for Environmental Protectionen
local.identifier.epublicationsvtls086414574en
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.schoolInstitute for Rural Futuresen
local.profile.schoolInstitute For Rural Futuresen
local.profile.schoolInstitute For Rural Futuresen
local.profile.emaildbrunckh@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailireeve@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailpmorley@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailkbock@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordpes:6843en
local.publisher.placeBerlin, Germanyen
local.identifier.totalchapters29en
local.format.startpage253en
local.format.endpage275en
local.title.subtitleDeriving social-ecological frameworks for managing landscapes and regionsen
local.contributor.lastnameBrunckhorsten
local.contributor.lastnameReeveen
local.contributor.lastnameMorleyen
local.contributor.lastnameBocken
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dbrunckhen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ireeveen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pmorleyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kbocken
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:2541en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleStrategic spatial governanceen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://books.google.com.au/books?id=lvFZmQHy2h8C&lpg=PR1&pg=PA253en
local.relation.urlhttp://nla.gov.au/anbd.bib-an43252138en
local.search.authorBrunckhorst, David Johnen
local.search.authorReeve, Ianen
local.search.authorMorley, Philipen
local.search.authorBock, Karlen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2008en
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,122
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.