Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2412
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaine, Geoffreyen
dc.contributor.authorWright, Victoren
dc.contributor.authorCooksey, Rayen
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T11:43:00Z-
dc.date.created2008en
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2412-
dc.description.abstractTechnological change and innovation is a fundamental force shaping our lifestyles, our culture and our future. We devote a substantial proportion of our wealth to research activities that span all areas of society, including agriculture. We make this investment, at least with regard to agricultural research, primarily to create wealth and conserve our natural resources. The return to our investment in agricultural research, the wealth created and the resources conserved depends, in part, on the extent to which primary producers adopt the products of that research. Consequently, maximising the return to our investment in agricultural research involves identifying what research products are likely to be adopted by primary producers and by how many, and determining what processes are required to ensure the diffusion of research products among producers as rapidly as possible. All these depend on an intimate understanding of how the products of research can contribute to better satisfying the needs of primary producers in the conduct of their agricultural enterprises. The case was made in this thesis that established schools of thinking on the adoption behaviour of primary producers do not provide a rigorous, explicit procedure for discovering how innovations can contribute to satisfying the needs of primary producers as managers of agricultural enterprises. As a consequence, policy makers and investors in research and extension have lacked a rigorous method for identifying the population of potential adopters of agricultural innovations. This means policy making and investment in research and extension has sometimes lacked a thoroughly defensible foundation for setting priorities for agricultural research, and for designing and evaluating programs for promoting the adoption of agricultural innovations. The aim in this thesis was to describe a framework for discovering how agricultural innovations contribute to satisfying the needs of primary producers as managers of agricultural enterprises.en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleThe Adoption of Agricultural Innovationsen
dc.typeThesis Doctoralen
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultural Economicsen
local.contributor.firstnameGeoffreyen
local.contributor.firstnameVictoren
local.contributor.firstnameRayen
local.subject.for2008140201 Agricultural Economicsen
local.subject.seo729901 Technological and Organisational Innovationen
dcterms.RightsStatementCopyright 2008 - Geoffrey Kaineen
dc.date.conferred2009en
local.thesis.degreelevelDoctoralen
local.thesis.degreenameDoctor of Philosophyen
local.contributor.grantorUniversity of New Englanden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Business, Economics and Public Policyen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailGeoff.Kaine@dpi.vic.gov.auen
local.profile.emailvwright5@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrcooksey@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryT2en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune_thesis-20081205-09388en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameKaineen
local.contributor.lastnameWrighten
local.contributor.lastnameCookseyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:vwright5en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rcookseyen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:2485en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe Adoption of Agricultural Innovationsen
local.output.categorydescriptionT2 Thesis - Doctorate by Researchen
local.thesis.borndigitalyesen
local.search.authorKaine, Geoffreyen
local.search.supervisorWright, Victoren
local.search.supervisorCooksey, Rayen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3435be37-b39d-4309-a946-12053400178fen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/8ea019bc-9e65-4a4d-abeb-12bf59433aecen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.year.conferred2009en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3435be37-b39d-4309-a946-12053400178fen
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/8ea019bc-9e65-4a4d-abeb-12bf59433aecen
Appears in Collections:Thesis Doctoral
Files in This Item:
7 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE03.pdfAbstract65.46 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfThesis1.03 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 Next
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,812
checked on Jun 18, 2023

Download(s)

720
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.