Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19295
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Doug Pen
dc.contributor.authorFord, Hughen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Doug P Armstrong, Matthew W Hayward, Dorian Moro, Philip J Seddonen
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-21T10:46:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna, p. 155-165en
dc.identifier.isbn9781486303038en
dc.identifier.isbn9781486303021en
dc.identifier.isbn9781486303014en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19295-
dc.description.abstractThe rationale for most reintroductions is that: (1) habitat at the reintroduction site has been adequately restored through management or natural regeneration; and (2) natural colonisation is unlikely due to isolation from potential source populations. Therefore, reintroduction is usually preceded by restorative actions such as revegetation or control of exotic predators. However, where habitat has become fragmented, metapopulation theory suggests that absences of species from some sites could be due to isolation alone. That is, local extinctions may occur by chance in habitat fragments, and these are not recolonised if isolated. Therefore, in theory, reintroductions could be used to reverse declines of some species in fragmented landscapes without accompanying habitat restoration. We discuss the evidence necessary to assess whether this is a sensible strategy, noting that it will usually be impossible to obtain such evidence without doing the reintroductions. We then review three Australasian case studies where experimental reintroductions were done for this purpose. In all cases, isolation among fragments was found to be a significant barrier to dispersal, and reintroductions led to establishment and breeding in at least some fragments. However, these subpopulations ultimately declined to extinction. In the most extensive study, monitoring throughout the landscape revealed inter-fragment variation in adult survival that could account for fragments being unoccupied. This variation in habitat quality was subtle, because it was not associated with measures of vegetation structure or predator density. Metapopulation modelling suggested that improving connectivity (through reintroduction or corridors) would actually negatively impact the metapopulation by facilitating movement from source to sink fragments. Long-term research from the other case studies also suggested that absences from fragments followed declines due to habitat degradation, with isolation only being important in the final stages. Given the challenges involved in demonstrating that reintroduction to unrestored habitat fragments is a sensible strategy, we suggest that habitat restoration such as predator control should continue to be considered a necessary prerequisite for reintroduction in most circumstances.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Faunaen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleUsing reintroduction to compensate for isolation in fragmented landscapesen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsLandscape Ecologyen
local.contributor.firstnameDoug Pen
local.contributor.firstnameHughen
local.subject.for2008050104 Landscape Ecologyen
local.subject.seo2008960804 Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emaild.p.armstrong@massey.ac.nzen
local.profile.emailhford@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20160426-115836en
local.publisher.placeMelbourne, Australiaen
local.identifier.totalchapters20en
local.format.startpage155en
local.format.endpage165en
local.contributor.lastnameArmstrongen
local.contributor.lastnameForden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:hforden
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:19491en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleUsing reintroduction to compensate for isolation in fragmented landscapesen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://trove.nla.gov.au/version/209271108en
local.search.authorArmstrong, Doug Pen
local.search.authorFord, Hughen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2015en
local.subject.for2020410206 Landscape ecologyen
local.subject.seo2020180606 Terrestrial biodiversityen
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,164
checked on Apr 14, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.