Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15175
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLunney, Marken
local.source.editorEditor(s): Jin Fuhaien
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-02T14:04:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationQin quan fa de bi jiao yu fa zhan, p. 3-21en
dc.identifier.isbn9787301226438en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15175-
dc.languagezhen
dc.publisherPeking University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofQin quan fa de bi jiao yu fa zhanen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesYing Mei fa yan jiu xi lie cong shu [Anglo-American Law Review Series]en
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleAustralian Tort Law: Unity, Fragmentation and Complexityen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.subject.keywordsTort Lawen
local.contributor.firstnameMarken
local.subject.for2008180126 Tort Lawen
local.subject.seo2008949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classifieden
local.identifier.epublicationsvtls086685653en
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailmlunney@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryB1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140225-164019en
local.publisher.placeBeijing, Chinaen
local.identifier.totalchapters14en
local.format.startpage3en
local.format.endpage21en
local.title.subtitleUnity, Fragmentation and Complexityen
local.contributor.lastnameLunneyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mlunneyen
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1462-5960en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:15391en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.abstract.englishMuch recent tort scholarship and theorising has been concerned with creating supranational systems of tort law. The attempt to achieve overarching principles of tort law applicable in multiple jurisdictions is intuitively appealing (suggesting that there is a common theoretical framework for tort law) and practically important (by reducing costs). From an Australian point of view, however, the move towards a unified model of tort law is problematic because of the enormous changes made by legislation to the common law rules of tort law. That legislation has taken two forms. First, statutes have set up alternative liability regimes that effectively usurp the role of tort law in the areas in which they operate. The most potent examples of this phenomenon are the remedies provided under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). Second, state and Commonwealth legislatures have radically amended the common law of tort with the result that the common law applies in only a minority of cases. In Australia at least, an initially unified common law of tort has thus fragmented to reveal additional layers of complexity and divergence.en
local.title.maintitleAustralian Tort Lawen
local.output.categorydescriptionB1 Chapter in a Scholarly Booken
local.relation.urlhttp://www.worldcat.org/title/qin-quan-fa-de-bi-jiao-yu-fa-zhan/oclc/873407834en
local.search.authorLunney, Marken
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2013en
local.subject.for2020480605 Tort lawen
local.subject.seo2020239999 Other law, politics and community services not elsewhere classifieden
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter
School of Law
Files in This Item:
4 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2,246
checked on Mar 3, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Mar 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.