Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11431
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorButterfield, Rodney Noelen
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Christopheren
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-15T15:49:00Z
dc.date.created2012en
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11431en
dc.description.abstractWorks in Australian Economic History can be seen to exhibit great variety in both methodology and content. The main discerning feature of this variety is the use and non-use of explicit theory as an analytical structure; specifically, the use of Economics theory. Currently, the New Economic History has cemented this approach but in Australia it has not been a slow evolution towards this state of affairs. From the time of T.A. Coghlan to N.G. Butlin there have been significant works that have used theory as a methodology for analysis alongside other works that have used traditional narrative approaches. Similarly, the content of the works is even more varied. Some authors gladly admit that their works are contributions to other areas of study. An explanation for this situation could be the combination of the English narrative tradition in Economic History as well as more practical attitude towards developing an individual approach more suited to countries of recent settlement. The need for a theoretical structure to guide historical analysis is provided by Economics theory as the most logical and relevant means of explaining the history. As a discipline, Economic History must have a defining methodology and an area of content to maintain a separate identity. Kuhn and Lakatos are cited in support because of their highlighting of a community of scholars who accept certain 'rules of the game' (a "disciplinary matrix") as a defining characteristic and a guarantee of progress and continuing "puzzle solving" success. The major theme is the importance of methodology, the use of theory and the adequacy of explanation. Structured analysis with a definable theoretical base provides the best platform for analysis and adequate explanation. In practical terms there is a need for theory. The use of explicit theory to provide an analytical structure can be seen as a methodology. Narrative as a methodology is seen to be found wanting in terms of explanatory value. The Australian experience provides an inconsistent tradition of analytical Economic History, traditional narrative and works with content that may be more suitable in other disciplines. To some extent, the methodology chosen can be seen to determine not only how the work is presented but, also, what parts of the content will be focused on. Because of this tradition N.G. Butlin is seen more as a synthesiser than a revolutionary. He, in fact, praises some of his predecessors. Several further issues are seen to subsume this work. Definitional guidelines that outline the disciplinary boundaries are seen as essential; continuity and change in this context can be seen to revolve around the fact that N.G. Butlin was not the first Australian to write analytical Economic History with the use of an explicit theoretical structure; but as with many powerful syntheses, significant change can be seen to follow. Finally, the issue of progress is considered in terms of the improvement in explanatory value from the contribution of an analytical structure and the issue of whether or not an academic discipline can progress to a higher form of effectiveness.en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleThe Role of Theory and Methodology in Australian Economic Historyen
dc.typeThesis Masters Researchen
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
dc.subject.keywordsEconomic Historyen
local.contributor.firstnameRodney Noelen
local.contributor.firstnameChristopheren
local.subject.for2008140203 Economic Historyen
local.subject.seo2008850799 Energy Conservation and Efficiency not elsewhere classifieden
dcterms.RightsStatementCopyright 2012 - Rodney Noel Butterfielden
dc.date.conferred2012en
local.thesis.degreelevelMasters researchen
local.thesis.degreenameMaster of Economicsen
local.contributor.grantorUniversity of New Englanden
local.profile.schoolAdministrationen
local.profile.emailrbutterf@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailalloyd@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryT1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune_thesis-20120205-160444en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameButterfielden
local.contributor.lastnameLloyden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rbutterfen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:alloyden
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:11630en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe Role of Theory and Methodology in Australian Economic Historyen
local.output.categorydescriptionT1 Thesis - Masters Degree by Researchen
local.description.statisticsepubsVisitors: 133<br />Views: 134<br />Downloads: 14en
local.thesis.borndigitalyesen
local.search.authorButterfield, Rodney Noelen
local.search.supervisorLloyd, Christopheren
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/uneprodrest/retrieve/6f0634d5-e5b5-413f-a990-ca82f65328d9en
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/uneprodrest/retrieve/f502e980-1dd0-472d-99a1-f2cec2d01238en
Appears in Collections:Thesis Masters Research
Files in This Item:
10 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/MARCXML.xmlMARCXML.xml4.64 kBUnknownView/Open
open/SOURCE03.pdfhidden143.4 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfhidden541.85 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 Next
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

138
checked on Mar 5, 2019

Download(s)

60
checked on Mar 5, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.