Elsevier

One Health

Volume 15, December 2022, 100428
One Health

One Health gains momentum in Africa but room exists for improvement

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100428Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Institutional One Health-ness determines functionality and coordination capacity.

  • Africa's OH platforms function, but planning and sharing aspects are challenging.

  • Aspects of coverage and balance, biosafety and quality management remain weak.

  • ICT supported learning, and enhance skilled research apprenticeships are needed.

  • Though One Health has gained momentum, targeted improvement must prioritize gaps.

Abstract

Objectives

The degree of One-Healthiness of a system relates to the effectiveness of an institution to operate within the six main dimensions which identify to what extent it complies with One Health concept. This paper evaluates institutional compliance with One Health concept in 14 institutions from eight African countries.

Methods

We utilised the adapted Network for the Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) tool. The institutions included six national One Health platforms and eight other institutions utilizing One Health approaches. Semi-quantitative evaluation of One Health platforms' competencies in six aspects/dimensions concerning One Health operations and infrastructure: Systems Thinking, Planning, Transdisciplinary working, Sharing, Learning and Systemic Organization, was conducted.

Results

The evaluation revealed that although all aspects of One Health scored above average, systemic organization and working in One Health were the strongest areas where tremendous gains had been made across the evaluated countries. The aspects of planning, sharing, learning, and thinking should be optimized to achieve gains emanating from One Health approaches in Africa. Cultural and social balance, and integrated health approach were the strongest areas under working and thinking respectively. Thinking was particularly challenged in areas of dimensions coverage and balance, while planning was challenged in the areas of capacity for detection, identification, monitoring of infectious diseases; biosafety and quality management; skills through taught and distance-learning programmes; information and communication technologies to support learning and skills through research apprenticeships.

Conclusion

We conclude that although One Health has gained momentum in Africa, there still exists room for improvement. The revealed strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and gaps in One Health implementation provide an opportunity for prioritization and refocusing of efforts and resources to strengthen the identified weak areas.

Keywords

National One Health Platform
Functionality
Transdisciplinary
Integrated approaches to health
One Health evaluation
One Health index
One Health ratio

Cited by (0)

1

Contributed equally to the work.