Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9638
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Subhashnien
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Laliten
dc.contributor.authorReid, Nicken
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-07T12:01:00Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Spatial Science, 56(2), p. 241-252en
dc.identifier.issn1836-5655en
dc.identifier.issn1449-8596en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9638-
dc.description.abstractThe distribution of an invasive species, 'Lantana camara' L., was mapped using Landsat TM, SPOT 5 and Quickbird imagery with the maximum likelihood supervised classification method. The cost-effectiveness of the three different kinds of imagery was also evaluated. Landsat TM multi-spectral (MS) imagery provided an overall accuracy of 85.1 percent and a kappa coefficient of 0.78, while SPOT 5 imagery gave an overall accuracy of 84.9 percent and a kappa value of 0.77. Landsat TM was suitable for detecting dense infestations of lantana. Quickbird showed an overall accuracy of 84 percent and a kappa coefficient of 0.76. Spectral resolution and band position were more important than spatial resolution in classifying lantana accurately and the most cost-effective option was provided by Landsat TM with no significant difference in overall accuracies between the three types of imagery.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Asia Pacificen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Spatial Scienceen
dc.titleAccuracy comparison of Quickbird, Landsat TM and SPOT 5 imagery for 'Lantana camara' mappingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14498596.2011.623345en
dc.subject.keywordsPhotogrammetry and Remote Sensingen
local.contributor.firstnameSubhashnien
local.contributor.firstnameLaliten
local.contributor.firstnameNicken
local.subject.for2008090905 Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingen
local.subject.seo2008960414 Control of Plant Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species in Forest and Woodlands Environmentsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Educationen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailbtaylo26@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaillkumar@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnrei3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20120307-114725en
local.publisher.placeSingaporeen
local.format.startpage241en
local.format.endpage252en
local.identifier.scopusid84868132479en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume56en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameTayloren
local.contributor.lastnameKumaren
local.contributor.lastnameReiden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:btaylo26en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lkumaren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nrei3en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1624-0901en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9205-756Xen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-4377-9734en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:9829en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAccuracy comparison of Quickbird, Landsat TM and SPOT 5 imagery for 'Lantana camara' mappingen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorTaylor, Subhashnien
local.search.authorKumar, Laliten
local.search.authorReid, Nicken
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000306058400007en
local.year.published2011en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Mar 16, 2024

Page view(s)

1,128
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.