Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9026
Title: Competition for the biomass resource: Greenhouse impacts and implications for renewable energy incentive schemes
Contributor(s): Cowie, Annette  (author); Gardner, W David (author)
Publication Date: 2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.019
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/9026
Abstract: In Australia, the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) scheme, which targets a 9.5 TWh per annum increase in renewable electricity generation by 2010, is stimulating interest in bioenergy. Development of bioenergy projects may cause competition for biomass resources. For example, sawmill residues are an attractive feedstock for bioenergy, but are also utilised for particleboard manufacture. This study compares the greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation impacts of alternative scenarios where sawmill residues are used either for generation of electricity or for manufacture of particleboard. The study considers a theoretical particleboard plant processing 100 kt feedstock of dry sawmill residues per annum. If the sawmill residues are used instead for bioenergy, and the particleboard plant utilises fresh plantation biomass, 205 kt CO₂eq emissions are displaced. However, GHG emissions for particleboard manufacture increase by about 38 kt CO₂eq, equivalent to 19% of the fossil fuel emissions displaced, due to the higher fossil fuel requirements to harvest, transport, chip and dry the green biomass. Also, plantation carbon stock declines by 147 kt CO₂eq per year until a new equilibrium is reached after 30 years. This result is influenced particularly by the fossil fuel displaced, the relative efficiency of the fossil fuel and bioenergy plants, the moisture content of the sawmill residues, and the efficiency of the dryer in the particleboard plant. Under MRET, calculation of Renewable Energy Certificates is based solely on the quantity of power generated. This study illustrates that indirect consequences can reduce the GHG mitigation benefits of a bioenergy project. Increased emissions off-site, and loss of forest carbon stock, should be considered in calculating the net GHG mitigation benefit, and this should determine the credit earned by a bioenergy project.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Biomass & Bioenergy, 31(9), p. 601-607
Publisher: Pergamon
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 0961-9534
1873-2909
Field of Research (FOR): 050101 Ecological Impacts of Climate Change
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 960302 Climate Change Mitigation Strategies
960301 Climate Change Adaptation Measures
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 138
Views: 139
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

48
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.