e-Learning: Just how difficult can it be?

Title
e-Learning: Just how difficult can it be?
Publication Date
2010
Author(s)
Parkes, Mitchell
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-023X
Email: mparkes2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mparkes2
Reading, Christine E
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-7965
Email: creading@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:creading
Stein, Sarah
Editor
Editor(s): Donna Gronn and Geoff Romeo
Type of document
Conference Publication
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Australian Computers in Education (ACEC)
Place of publication
Australia
UNE publication id
une:7807
Abstract
This paper reports the partial results of a study using the Hybrid Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (Hybrid BARS) to identify the competencies considered essential for effective performance in a university e-learning environment. The competencies were developed in accordance with social constructivist principles and in the context of a Learning Management System. Students and staff at the university study site were surveyed to rate the relative difficulty of the e-learning competencies. The application of Rasch analysis to the difficulty ratings data allowed the competencies to be ranked hierarchically. Subsequent analysis identified a statistically significant difference between student and staff perceptions of difficulty of the e-learning competencies. Competencies identified as contributing to the significant difference included those dealing with interaction and collaboration with other members of the e-learning community. The main conclusion drawn from the study was that students found elements of e-learning environments developed in accordance with social constructivist principles to be challenging.
Link
Citation
Proceedings of the 21st Australian Computers in Education Conference: Digital Diversity
ISBN
9780646530055

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink