Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7530
Title: The Relation Between Peak Response Magnitudes and Agreement in Diagnoses Obtained From Two Different Phallometric Tests for Pedophilia
Contributor(s): Lykins, Amy  (author)orcid ; Cantor, James (author); Kuban, Michael (author); Blak, Thomas (author); Dickey, Robert (author); Klassen, Philip (author)
Publication Date: 2010
DOI: 10.1177/1079063209352094
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7530
Abstract: Phallometric testing is widely considered the best psychophysiological procedure for assessing erotic preferences in men. Researchers have differed, however, on the necessity of setting some minimum criterion of penile response for ascertaining the interpretability of a phallometric test result. Proponents of a minimum criterion have generally based their view on the intuitive notion that "more is better" rather than any formal demonstration of this. The present study was conducted to investigate whether there is any empirical evidence for this intuitive notion, by examining the relation between magnitude of penile response and the agreement in diagnoses obtained in two test sessions using different laboratory stimuli. The results showed that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on both tests and that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on the second test after controlling for their response on the first test. Results also indicated that at response levels less than 1 cm³, diagnostic consistency was no better than chance, supporting the establishment of a minimum response level criterion.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(1), p. 42-57
Publisher: Sage Publications Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1079-0632
1573-286X
Field of Research (FOR): 170104 Forensic Psychology
170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 920209 Mental Health Services
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 325
Views: 326
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

62
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.