Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The Extension of Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Testamentary Competency and Substitute Decision-Making in the Australian Context||Contributor(s):||Purser, Kelly (author); Magner, Eilis (author); Madison, Jeanne (author)||Publication Date:||2010||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7262||Abstract:||Given the increasing dilemmas presented by the aging of the Australian population, the authors have undertaken the task of reassessing the approach to testamentary competency and substitute decision-making. Here they explore the question of whether therapeutic jurisprudence offers a useful theoretical framework for this task. Slobogin's critique of therapeutic jurisprudence provides the framework for a general discussion of the school of thought. The question of whether problems arise when using its insights in the Australian context is considered. The authors conclude that the principles of trust, participation and dignity promoted by therapeutic jurisprudence are highly desirable considerations in any re-examination of testamentary and substitute decision-making in Australia.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Journal of Applied Law and Policy, v.2010, p. 1-13||Publisher:||Curtin University of Technology||Place of Publication:||Perth, Australia||ISSN:||1836-6953||Field of Research (FOR):||189999 Law and Legal Studies not elsewhere classified||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://www.business.curtin.edu.au/files/ch_1_The_Extension_Of_Therapeutic_Jurisprudence2.pdf||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 178
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.