Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6694
Title: Political Economy of the Indonesian Sugar Market
Contributor(s): Sudjalmo, Sigit B (author); Simmons, Phillip  (supervisor); Chang, Christie (supervisor); Parton, Kevin (supervisor); Piggott, Ronald (supervisor)
Conferred Date: 2000
Copyright Date: 1998
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6694
Abstract: The objective of this study was to develop a political economy framework to explain policies in the Indonesian sugar market. The study investigated government intervention in the sugar market and made an attempt to explain why the policies were in place. The method was traced from the economic theory of regulation and special emphasis was given to the Political Preference Function (PPF) framework. The PPF acted as a governing function or a criterion for government policy decision making. With regard to this framework, the participants in the sugar market were disaggregated into three main players, producers, consumers and government. The study focused on the analysis of political weights embodied in the PPF framework. The PPF framework in the study was applied by developing an empirical model capturing political and economic markets. The policies were evaluated in terms of their efficiency. Following the political economy framework, this study investigated policy efficiency in both political markets (demand side) and economic markets (supply side). This approach was also used 10 show that reform in agricultural policy can only be evaluated with the existence of the PPF. Results of maximising the objective function revealed that the policymakers give the highest weight to the government itself. This implied that there was government self interest in the policy decision making. The analysis showed that the policy objective of supporting producers was achieved at a cost to consumers, while at the same time the government took revenue from the policy. With regard to the optimal policy, the study revealed that producer price and consumer price policy was found to be guile efficient; on average it was 0.9 during the period of the study. This means only 10 per cent of wealth are wasted for every unit of wealth transferred between the groups. In regard to the alternative policy, the study showed that setting producer price and consumer price was more efficient than applying import quota. It confirmed the claim made by Bulog that it treated import as a residual, only to till the gap between domestic production and consumption.
Publication Type: Thesis Doctoral
Rights Statement: Copyright 1998 - Sigit B Sudjalmo
HERDC Category Description: T2 Thesis - Doctorate by Research
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 216
Views: 196
Downloads: 32
Appears in Collections:Thesis Doctoral

Files in This Item:
8 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE05.pdfThesis, part 23.58 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE03.pdfAbstract376.02 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfThesis, part 15.47 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 Next
Show full item record

Page view(s)

72
checked on Dec 29, 2018

Download(s)

24
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.