Bringing objectivity to wildlife management: Welfare effects of guardian dogs

Title
Bringing objectivity to wildlife management: Welfare effects of guardian dogs
Publication Date
2019
Author(s)
Allen, Benjamin L
Allen, Lee R
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-3342
Email: lmcleod7@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:lmcleod7
Ballard, Guy
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0287-9720
Email: gballar3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:gballar3
Drouilly, Marine
Fleming, Peter J S
Hampton, Jordan O
Hayward, Matthew W
Kerley, Graham I H
Meek, Paul D
Minnie, Liaan
O'Riain, M Justin
Parker, Daniel M
Somers, Michael J
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Place of publication
The Netherlands
DOI
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.024
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/63679
Abstract

The use of large carnivores and guardian dogs as biocontrol tools against other animals is increasingly recommended despite an absence of assessments of their welfare effects. We provided the first attempt at such an objective assessment in Allen et al. (2019), based on a recognised methodology and as per our commitment to evidence-based wildlife management. We concluded that their very nature means that "large carnivores and guardian dogs cause considerable lethal and nonlethal animal welfare impacts to the individual animals they are intended to control", and that these impacts "should not be ignored or dismissively assumed to be negligible." Harmful impacts arise because large carnivores and guardian dogs scare, displace, threaten, attack and kill other animals.

Link
Citation
Biological Conservation, v.236
ISSN
1873-2917
0006-3207

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink