Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury

Title
Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury
Publication Date
2021
Author(s)
Shaikh, Nusratnaaz
Theadom, Alice
Siegert, Richard
Hardaker, Natalie
King, Douglas
Hume, Patria
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd
Place of publication
United Kingdom
DOI
10.1186/s12883-021-02410-6
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/63524
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) symptom scale in a sample of people with a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) through Rasch analysis, and to obtain an interval level measurement score for potential clinical use.

Materials and methods: Data were obtained from 114 adults aged over 16 years, who had experienced at least one mTBI in the past 10 years. Participants were recruited via social media, concussion clinics and sports organisations over a 4-month period between May and September 2020. Participants were asked to compete the symptom scale of the BIST tool via an anonymous online questionnaire. Internal construct validity, dimensionality, person separation index, and diferential item functioning of the BIST were examined with Rasch analysis.

Results: BIST in its original form produced a satisfactory item-trait interaction, and good reliability, but was found to be multi-dimensional. Rasch analysis of the full scale with three domains as subtests resulted in acceptable model ft (χ 2 (6) =3.8, p > 0.05), with good reliability (Person Separation Index=0.84), and uni-dimensionality. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis displayed no significant DIF effects for sex or age revealing that people responded consistently and similarly to the individual BIST items based on severity of symptom burden.

Conclusions: The 15-item symptom scale of the BIST tool is a psychometrically sound measure of symptom burden following mTBI. The findings provide support for use of both total and sub scale scores for clinical use. Ordinal to interval score conversions are recommended for use when using the scores for research purposes in mTBI.

Link
Citation
BMC Neurology, 21(1), p. 1-10
ISSN
1471-2377
Start page
1
End page
10
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/RaschKing2021JournalArticle.pdf 1343.551 KB application/pdf Published version View document