Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63511
Title: International demand for food and services drives environmental footprints of pesticide use
Contributor(s): Tang, Fiona H M  (author); Malik, Arunima (author); Li, Mengyu (author); Lenzen, Manfred (author); Maggi, Federico (author)
Publication Date: 2022-11-07
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00601-8
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/63511
Abstract: 

Pesticides are well-recognised pollutants that threaten biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Here we quantify the environmental footprints of pesticide use for 82 countries and territories and eight broad regions using top-down multi-region input-output analysis. Pesticide footprints are expressed as hazard loads that quantify the body weight (bw) of non-target organisms required to absorb pesticide residues without experiencing adverse effects. We show that the world's consumption in 2015 resulted in 2 Gt-bw of pesticide footprints. Of these, 32% are traded internationally. The global average per-capita pesticide footprint is 0.27 t-bw capita−1 y−1 , with high-income countries having the largest per-capita footprint. China, Germany, and United Kingdom are the top three net importers of pesticide hazard loads embodied in commodities, while the USA, Brazil, and Spain are the three largest net exporters. Our study highlights the need for policies to target pesticide use reduction while ensuring adverse impacts are not transferred to other nations.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Communications Earth and Environment, 3(1), p. 1-12
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 2662-4435
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 4106 Soil sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/Internationaltang2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.97 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons