Digesta passage and nutrient digestibility in Boran steers at low feed intake levels

Title
Digesta passage and nutrient digestibility in Boran steers at low feed intake levels
Publication Date
2019-09
Author(s)
Ali, Asep I M
Wassie, Shimels E
Korir, Daniel
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1356-8039
Email: dsitiene@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:dsitiene
Goopy, John P
Merbold, Lutz
Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
Dickhoefer, Uta
Schlecht, Eva
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Verlag GmbH
Place of publication
Germany
DOI
10.1111/jpn.13158
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/63168
Abstract

The present study evaluated the effects of energetic undernutrition on liquid and solid digesta passage and on nutrient digestibility as well as their interdependencies. Using a 4 x 4 Latin square design, 12 growing Boran steers (183 ± 15.2 kg live weight) were allocated to four levels of metabolizable energy (ME) supply fixed at 100, 80, 60 and 40% of individual maintenance energy requirements (MER) during four ex‐ perimental periods. Each period comprised three weeks of adaptation, two weeks of data collection and two weeks of recovery. Diets MER80, MER60 and MER40 only consisted of Rhodes grass hay (RGH), whereas diet MER100 contained (as fed) 83% RGH, 8% cottonseed meal and 9% sugarcane molasses. Feed intake differed between treatments (p < .001) and ranged from 40 ± 0.6 g dry matter (DM) per kg of metabolic weight (kg0.75) in MER40 to 81 ± 1.3 g DM in MER100. Digestibility of neutral and acid detergent fibre (NDF, ADF) was highest at MER80, whereas rumen retention time of liquid and solid digesta was longest at MER40. The correlation of the rumen retention time of liquid and solid digesta with the digestibility of proximate diet components was weak but positive, whereas the correlation of liquid and solid rumen retention time with quantitative feed and nutrient intake was strong (p < .01) and negative. Our results suggest that tropical cattle are able to buffer a moderate energy deficit by prolonging rumen retention time of digesta and hence improve diet digestibility. Conversely, a severe energy deficit cannot be buffered by digestive adaptation mechanisms and will inevitably lead to productivity losses.

Link
Citation
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 103(5), p. 1325-1337
ISSN
1439-0396
0931-2439
Start page
1325
End page
1337

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink