Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62518
Title: Resting anxiety increases EEG delta–beta correlation: Relationships with the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality traits
Contributor(s): De Pascalis, Vilfredo  (author)orcid ; Vecchio, Arianna (author); Cirillo, Giuliana (author)
Publication Date: 2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109796
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62518
Abstract: 

Research has shown that the coupling between slow and fast EEG frequency oscillations reflects cortico-subcortical interaction. Specifically, the between-subject delta-beta amplitude-amplitude correlation is found to increase in some hypothetically anxiogenic conditions. We tested whether cortical-subcortical coupling would increase as a function of decreased delta (theta) or higher beta (gamma) activity. EEG recording was obtained from a group of 59 students during a resting anxiogenic situation (Anxiety) and from another group of 66 during a relaxation situation (Relaxation). Participants filled out the State Anxiety and the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality Questionnaire. Between-subjects cross-frequency correlations were calculated between power values in the delta (theta) and beta (gamma) frequency bands and compared between Anxiety and Relaxation groups. A significant positive between-subject delta-beta correlation was observed in the resting Anxiety, and this association was significantly higher than that observed in the Relaxation group. In the Anxiety, but not Relaxation group, we observed a delta-beta coupling for the low delta activity. In the Anxiety group, BIS trait was significantly associated with higher strength of within-subject delta-beta coupling, while in the Relaxation group BIS was positively associated with delta-theta coupling. Interesting, in both resting Anxiety and Relaxation groups, BAS-GDP was positively associated with higher delta-gamma coupling.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Personality and Individual Differences, v.156, p. 1-6
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1873-3549
0191-8869
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 5202 Biological psychology
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.