Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Approaches to learning in Educational Psychology and Mathematics: A comparative analysis in the South Pacific region
Contributor(s): Phan, Huy  (author)orcid ; Deo, Bisun (author)
Publication Date: 2007
Handle Link:
Abstract: Emerging evidence has indicated that students from varying cultures and disciplines differ from each other in their approaches to learning. Two studies were conducted to examine how tertiary students at the University of the South Pacific differ in their learning approaches in subject disciplines of Educational Psychology and Mathematics. In Study I we examined learning approaches of second-year students in Educational Psychology (N = 200; 125 females, 75 males) and in Mathematics (N = 221; 94 females, 127 males) with the use of a modified version of Biggs' (1987) Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ). Analysis of results by EFA and CFA indicated a two-factor model as descriptive of student learning approaches for the Educational Psychology cohort. The two factors in this case were depicted as Meaning and Reproducing, and hence substantiating Richardson's (1994) theorisation and argument that there are two, and not three, main approaches to learning. In comparison, the Mathematics cohort results differed and showed a higher-order factor structure of student learning approaches. In Study II we used the revised version of the SPQ (SPQ-R-2F: Biggs, Kember, & Leung, 2001) to investigate the learning approaches of the same cohort of students enrolled in Educational Psychology (N = 314; 166 females, 148 males). This study revealed that students' approaches to their learning in Educational Psychology, using an alternative inventory, were also defined by two main approaches - Deep and Surface. The results from the two studies then, indicate the need to rethink and to reconceptualize the theoretical paradigm of learning approaches with reference to academic subject disciplines. They also suggest the importance of readdressing the learning inventories that are used to measure learning approaches in different subject disciplines, and to question the acceptance and universality of these learning inventories (e.g., SPQ). The results of both studies, when compared cross-culturally with other Western and non-Western findings, also indicate theoretical and pedagogical implications pertaining to culture and learning.
Publication Type: Conference Publication
Conference Name: AARE 2006 International Education Research Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 26th - 30th November, 2006
Conference Details: AARE 2006 International Education Research Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 26th - 30th November, 2006
Source of Publication: AARE 2006 International Education Research Conference Proceedings, p. 1-33
Publisher: AARE: Australian Association for Research in Education
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1324-9339
Field of Research (FOR): 170103 Educational Psychology
139999 Education not elsewhere classified
130103 Higher Education
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: E1 Refereed Scholarly Conference Publication
Other Links:
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 156
Views: 167
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
School of Education

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 29, 2018
Google Media

Google ScholarTM


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.