Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Did Ricardo Really Have a Law of Comparative Advantage? A Comparison of Ricardo's Version and the Modern Version||Contributor(s):||Pullen, John Michael (author)||Publication Date:||2006||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/6200||Abstract:||This article compares Ricardo's statements on the Law of Comparative Advantage (LCA) with modern versions. It interprets Ricardo's LCA as a practical guide or as a piece of useful commercial advice for commodity traders, and argues that, contrary to modern versions, Ricardo's LCA does not constitute a logical basis for international specialisation of production. It contends that Ricardo's case for international specialisation is based on absolute advantage, not comparative advantage. It concludes that, if 'LCA' is taken to mean the LCA as found in modern textbooks, then Ricardo did not have a Law of Comparative Advantage.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||History of Economics Review, 44(Summer), p. 59-75||Publisher:||History of Economic Thought Society of Australia||Place of Publication:||Australia||ISSN:||1037-0196||Field of Research (FOR):||130313 Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators||Socio-Economic Outcome Codes:||930299 Teaching and Instruction not elsewhere classified||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://www.hetsa.org.au/historyeconreview/archive/27-volume-44.html||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 50
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.