The use of songs for mate-attraction is common. Intensive songs may indicate high energetic investment, reflecting an individual’s resource-holding potential and attractiveness as a prospective mate. Consequently, there can be a direct relationship between song metrics and lifetime reproductive success. While singing is held to be energetically costly, quantitative studies in mammals are lacking. Here, we present an exploratory analysis of energetic costs in a singing bat (Mystacina tuberculata). We recorded the songs of 12 male bats and quantified skin temperature (Tsk) responses using temperature telemetry to estimate energy expenditure. We hypothesised that singing would be energetically costly and predicted correlations between Tsk and song duty cycle and between duty cycle and body size. Contrary to our expectations, we found estimated energetic expenditure while singing to be comparatively low. We also found no relationship between estimated energy expenditure and duty cycle, and neither estimated energy expenditure nor duty cycle was correlated with body size. Our results suggest that energetic costs of singing in bats may be lower than previously assumed, and that song output may convey only limited fitness information.