Food Loss and Waste Definitions and Measurement Issues: The Case of the Maize Sector in Mozambique

Title
Food Loss and Waste Definitions and Measurement Issues: The Case of the Maize Sector in Mozambique
Publication Date
2021
Author(s)
Popat, Meizal
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-6870
Email: mpopat2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mpopat2
Griffith, Garry
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-6222
Email: ggriffit@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:ggriffit
Cacho, Oscar
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1542-4442
Email: ocacho@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:ocacho
Mounter, Stuart
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-3756
Email: smounte2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:smounte2
Editor
Editor(s): J Deiters, U Rickert and G Schiefer
Type of document
Conference Publication
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
CentMa, International Center for Management, Communication and Research
Place of publication
Germany
DOI
10.18461/pfsd.2021.2111
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/59631
Abstract

Current estimates point to food loss and waste as costing around $US 900 billion dollars a year. That is equivalent to around one-third of global food production. The magnitude of this valuation, however, is reliant on the effective measurement of the actual amount of food loss and waste. There are various definitions of this problem, which differ in their scope. FAO, FUSION and WRI are the most prominent institutions that have proposed different definitions of food loss and waste. All of these definitions have been at least partially criticized. Nonetheless, FAO's definition and methodology have been the basis for many studies attempting to quantify food loss and waste. FAO's methodology is based more on estimation rather than direct measurements. Taking the example of maize in Mozambique, using FAO's methodology to measure food loss and waste at the farm level seems to provide estimates comparable to the available statistics from the national agricultural surveys. Direct measurements on the other hand, apart from being costly, seem to suffer from representativeness problems as highlighted by some authors. Also, some of the direct measurement methods proposed by some authors seem to look at food loss and waste as a static problem, rather than a dynamic problem that evolves over time. Regardless of the level where the problem of food loss and waste occurs (upper or lower end of supply chains), it results in a deadweight loss for society. That is demonstrated by a Marshallian supply and demand diagram.

Link
Citation
Proceedings of the 15th International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks, International Journal on Food System Dynamics, v.15, p. 88-95
ISSN
2194-511X
Start page
88
End page
95
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/FoodPopatGriffithCachoMounter2021ConferenceAbstract.pdf 1076.606 KB application/pdf Published Version View document