Selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle results in bigger cows that eat more

Abstract

<p><b>Context.</b> Measurement of weight provides the basis of most performance-recording schemes for beef cattle around the world. The limitation of faster growth rate as a breeding objective, without considering changes in mature-cow weight, is the expected increase in cow size and, hence, feed requirements. <b>Aims.</b> To measure the correlated changes in feed intake and efficiency of cows, calves and the cow–calf unit following divergent selection for growth rate. <b>Methods.</b> The cows and their calves came from three lines of Angus cattle selected for either fast weight gain to yearling age (the High-line), slow weight gain (the Low-line), or from an unselected Control-line. Efficiency was evaluated over an annual production cycle. Individual cow weights and feed intakes, and calf growth and feed intake (including milk), were recorded. Milk production, milk composition and body composition were also measured so that correlated changes in efficiency of use of energy and nitrogen could be determined. <b>Key results. </b>The High-line cows were 18% (<i>P </i> < 0.05) heavier than the Low-line cows at the start and consumed 7% (<i>P </i> < 0.05) more feed than did the Low-line cows. Feed efficiency of the cow–calf unit was 12% higher (<i>P </i> < 0.05) in the High-line cows and calves than in the Low-line cows and calves. When compared on the basis of feed used relative to their weight and weight gain there was no difference (<i>P </i>> 0.05) between the selection lines. Divergent selection was accompanied by a change in body composition, with the High-line cows containing proportionally less protein and more fat in their bodies than did the Low-line cows. There was no evidence for change in the efficiency of feed energy use, but there was a 10% (<i>P </i>< 0.05) improvement in nitrogen efficiency of the cow–calf unit in the High-line compared with the Low-line. <b>Conclusions.</b> Divergent selection for weight gain led to a correlated change in cow size and cow feed requirements. <b>Implications.</b> This experiment supported the consensus among earlier reviews that there is little evidence that selection for growth rate or size, without moderating change in mature-cow weight, is associated with improved efficiency of feed energy use in maternal beef breeds.</p>