Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59222
Title: COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic
Contributor(s): Siebenhofer, Andrea (author); Scott, Anna Mae (author); Avian, Alexander (author); Terebessy, Andras (author); Mergenthal, Karola (author); Schaffler-Schaden, Dagmar (author); Bachler, Herbert (author); Huter, Sebastian (author); Zelko, Erika (author); Murray, Amanda (author); Guppy, Michelle  (author)orcid ; Piccoliori, Giuliano (author); Streit, Sven (author); Jeitler, Klaus (author); Flamm, Maria (author)
Publication Date: 2022-12-06
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072515
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59222
Abstract: 

Objectives: General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients’ first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: International cross-sectional online survey.

Setting: General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland.

Participants: Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey.

Main outcome measures: We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff.

Results: GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1–7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0–7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4–5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9–5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6–5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4–3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2–3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect sta (2.2 95% CI 1.9–2.4). Dierences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries.

Conclusion: Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected dierences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Frontiers in Public Health, v.10, p. 1-10
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2296-2565
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 3202 Clinical sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/COVI-PrimGuppy2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version1.09 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons