COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic

Author(s)
Siebenhofer, Andrea
Scott, Anna Mae
Avian, Alexander
Terebessy, Andras
Mergenthal, Karola
Schaffler-Schaden, Dagmar
Bachler, Herbert
Huter, Sebastian
Zelko, Erika
Murray, Amanda
Guppy, Michelle
Piccoliori, Giuliano
Streit, Sven
Jeitler, Klaus
Flamm, Maria
Publication Date
2022-12-06
Abstract
<p><b>Objectives:</b> General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients’ first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p> <p><b>Design:</b> International cross-sectional online survey.</p> <p><b>Setting:</b> General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland.</p> <p><b>Participants:</b> Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey.</p> <p><b>Main outcome measures:</b> We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1–7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0–7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4–5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9–5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6–5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4–3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2–3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect sta (2.2 95% CI 1.9–2.4). Dierences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries.</p> <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected dierences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives.</p>
Citation
Frontiers in Public Health, v.10, p. 1-10
ISSN
2296-2565
Link
Publisher
Frontiers Research Foundation
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International
Title
COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic
Type of document
Journal Article
Entity Type
Publication

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/COVI-PrimGuppy2022JournalArticle.pdf 1118.936 KB application/pdf Published Version View document