Forecasting carrot yield with optimal timing of Sentinel 2 image acquisition

Title
Forecasting carrot yield with optimal timing of Sentinel 2 image acquisition
Publication Date
2023
Author(s)
Suarez Cadavid, L A
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4233-2172
Email: lsuarezc@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:lsuarezc
Robertson-Dean, Melanie
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-773X
Email: mrober68@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mrober68
Brinkhoff, J
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-2458
Email: jbrinkho@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jbrinkho
Robson, A
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-8980
Email: arobson7@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:arobson7
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Springer New York LLC
Place of publication
United States of America
DOI
10.1007/s11119-023-10083-z
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/58856
Abstract

Accurate, non-destructive forecasting of carrot yield is difcult due to its subterranean growing habit. Furthermore, the timing of forecasting usually occurs when the crop is mature, limiting the opportunity to implement alternative management decisions to improve yield (during the growing season). This study aims to improve the accuracy of carrot yield forecasting by exploring time series and multivariate approaches. Using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery in three Australian vegetable regions, we established a time series of carrot phenological stages (PhS) from 'days after sowing' (DAS) to enhance prediction timing. Numerous vegetation indices (VIs) were analyzed to derive temporal growth patterns. Correlations with yield at diferent PhS were established. Although the average root yield (t ha−1) did not signifcantly difer across the regions, the temporal VI signatures, indicating diferent regional crop growth trends, did vary as well as the PhS at when the maximum correlation with yield occurred (PhSR2max) with two of the regions producing a delayed PhSR2max (i.e. 90–130 DAS). The best multivariate model was identifed at 70 DAS, extending the forecasting window before harvest between 20 to 60 days. The performance of this model was validated with new crops producing an average error of 16.9 t ha−1 (27% of total yield). These results demonstrate the potential of the model at such early stage under varying growing conditions ofering growers and stakeholders the chance to optimize farming practices, make informed decisions on selling, harvesting, and labor planning, and adopt precision agriculture methods.

Link
Citation
Precision Agriculture, v.25, p. 570-588
ISSN
1573-1618
1385-2256
Start page
570
End page
588
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/ForecastingSuarezCadavidRobertsonDeanBrinkhoffRobson2024JournalArticle.pdf 3434.282 KB application/pdf Published version View document