Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58772
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlvarenga, F A Pen
dc.contributor.authorBansi, Hen
dc.contributor.authorDobos, R Cen
dc.contributor.authorAustin, K Len
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, A Jen
dc.contributor.authorWoodgate, R Ten
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, P Len
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T01:46:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-30T01:46:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-20-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Production Science, 61(3), p. 337-343en
dc.identifier.issn1836-5787en
dc.identifier.issn1836-0939en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58772-
dc.description.abstract<p><b><i>Context.</i></b> Beef industry productivity and profitability would be enhanced by improved efficiency at pasture. Our research is evaluating performance at pasture of Angus heifers divergent in estimated breeding values for residual feed intake determined from feedlot data (RFI-f-EBV) under a range of grazing conditions.</p> <p><b><i>Aims.</i></b> To determine whether Low- and High-RFI-f-EBV cattle differ in their growth response when pasture quality and availability become limiting to performance.</p> <p><b><i>Methods.</i></b> Eight-month-old heifers (<i>n </i>= 40) weaned at 6 months of age grazed within two replicates of 20, each with 10 low feedlot-efficiency (High-RFI-f-EBV) and 10 high feedlot-efficiency (Low-RFI-f-EBV) heifers. Each replicate grazed each of eight 1.25-ha paddocks comprising severely drought-affected, low-quality (mean dry-matter (DM) digestibility 44.1%, crude protein 7.3% DM, and 6.1 MJ metabolisable energy/kg DM) mixed perennial and annual native temperate grasses at 7-day intervals during repeated 28-day cycles, with Phase 1 with 2834 kg DM/ha and Phase 2 with 1890 kg DM/ha mean starting biomass. Heifers were yard-weighed weekly on nine occasions during the 8-week study.</p> <p><b><i>Key results.</i></b> During Phase 1 of grazing, the heifers gained 6.2 kg liveweight (LW) and during Phase 2 of grazing they lost 10 kg LW on average. Differences in LW between the RFI-f-EBV groups were not evident at the start or end of the study. However, over the 56 days of study, average daily change in LW calculated from the difference between starting and final LW was higher for Low-RFI-f-EBV heifers than for High-RFI-f-EBV heifers (–33 vs –127 g/day, s.e.m. = 41 g/day, <i>P </i>= 0.026). A similar result was evident when average daily LW change was determined from regression of LW on the day of study (–6 vs –96 g/day, s.e.m. = 41 g/day, <i>P </i>= 0.033). No significant interactions between grazing Phase and RFI-EBV group were evident for the growth responses.</p> <p><b><i>Conclusions.</i></b> Higher feedlot-efficiency (Low-RFI-f-EBV) weaner heifers maintained LW somewhat better than lower feedlot-efficiency (High-RFI-f-EBV) heifers, as the nutritional availability at pasture became more limiting.</p> <p><b><i>Implications.</i></b> Low-RFI-f-EBV weaner heifers may be more nutritionally resilient than are High-RFI-f-EBV heifers under drought conditions and, hence, may require less supplementary feed to maintain growth performance.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Scienceen
dc.titlePerformance of Angus weaner heifers varying in residual feed intake-feedlot estimated breeding values grazing severely drought-affected pastureen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/AN20152en
dc.subject.keywordsnet feed intakeen
dc.subject.keywordsbeef cattleen
dc.subject.keywordsgeneticsen
dc.subject.keywordsgrazing efficiencyen
dc.subject.keywordsgrowthen
dc.subject.keywordsAgriculture, Dairy & Animal Scienceen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultureen
local.contributor.firstnameF A Pen
local.contributor.firstnameHen
local.contributor.firstnameR Cen
local.contributor.firstnameK Len
local.contributor.firstnameA Jen
local.contributor.firstnameR Ten
local.contributor.firstnameP Len
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolschool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailfpereir3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailhbansi@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrdobos2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailkaustin8@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage337en
local.format.endpage343en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume61en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.contributor.lastnameAlvarengaen
local.contributor.lastnameBansien
local.contributor.lastnameDobosen
local.contributor.lastnameAustinen
local.contributor.lastnameDonaldsonen
local.contributor.lastnameWoodgateen
local.contributor.lastnameGreenwooden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:fpereir3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:hbansien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rdobos2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kaustin8en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1823-0675en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9110-6729en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/58772en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitlePerformance of Angus weaner heifers varying in residual feed intake-feedlot estimated breeding values grazing severely drought-affected pastureen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis work was funded by NSW DPI, CSIRO, University of New England (UNE) and the Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) Donor Co. as part of Project P.PSH.1000 Increasing Profit from Pasture through Increased Feed Efficiency within the Livestock Productivity Partnership.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorAlvarenga, F A Pen
local.search.authorBansi, Hen
local.search.authorDobos, R Cen
local.search.authorAustin, K Len
local.search.authorDonaldson, A Jen
local.search.authorWoodgate, R Ten
local.search.authorGreenwood, P Len
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/101f78e2-7f96-4de3-ae99-144d58965b26en
local.subject.for20203003 Animal productionen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.