Total amino acid level affects the results of standardized ileal digestibility assays for feed ingredients for swine

Title
Total amino acid level affects the results of standardized ileal digestibility assays for feed ingredients for swine
Publication Date
2023-06
Author(s)
Bloxham, Darlene J
Azain, Michael
Pesti, Gene M
Wu, Shu-Biao
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1790-6015
Email: swu3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:swu3
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Zhongguo Xumu Shouyi Xuehui,Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine
Place of publication
China
DOI
10.1016/j.aninu.2022.08.018
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/58375
Abstract

It has been demonstrated that the fiber content of oilseed meals and total amino acids (AA) in distillers' grains products affects standardized ileal digestibility (SID) values from swine assays and that total protein concentration affects the AA digestibility in assays using chickens. This analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that the total AA content of test samples affects the SID assay results. Databases containing total AA profiles and SID values of 20 feedstuffs commonly fed to pigs from 2 sources, AMINODat 5.0 (Evonik Industries, 2015) and the Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 12th edition (NRC, 2012) were used to compare AA concentration effects on standardized ileal digestibility coefficients. Databases were compared with AA and SID available in both data sets. The total AA values were similar for the 2 databases with an R2 of 0.979 (P < 0.001). The linear relationship between digestibility coefficients from the 2 databases was highly significant, an R2 of 0.810 (P < 0.001). Both databases had increased SID values with increasing AA contents within and across feed ingredients. The SID = f(AA concentration) relationship was confirmed with an individual paper. Since SID, as typically measured, is a function of both digestion and absorption, both processes following MichaeliseMenten kinetics, SID = f(AA concentration) may simply be a natural phenomenon. Other reasons for the relationship were explored. Methods of estimating endogenous AA losses and misapplication statistical procedures may contribute to variation in results and at least partially explain why SID = f(AA concentration).

Link
Citation
Animal Nutrition, v.13, p. 19-30
ISSN
2405-6383
2405-6545
Start page
19
End page
30
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/TotalaminoPestiWu2023JournalArticle.htm 164.522 KB Published version View document