Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58299
Title: Increasing mud levels in a feedlot influences beef cattle behaviours but not preference for feedlot or pasture environments
Contributor(s): Dickson, Emily J  (author)orcid ; Campbell, Dana L M  (author); Monk, Jessica E  (author)orcid ; Lea, Jim M (author); Colditz, Ian G  (author); Lee, Caroline  (author)
Publication Date: 2022
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105718
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58299
Related Research Outputs: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62544
Abstract: 

Public scrutiny surrounds the intensive feedlot finishing of beef cattle, likely due to the assumption that cattle cannot perform their full repertoire of natural behaviours. However, it is not well-known how certain aspects of the environment influence both cattle perception of a feedlot environment and the behaviours they perform within it, particularly with increasing levels of mud. The objective of this study was to perform a Y-maze test to assess the preference of Angus steers for either a pasture environment or a feedlot at three pad scores, which were based on increasing mud depth relative to the cattle's hoof and leg. Cattle were tested both morning and afternoon for ten consecutive days, with lying behaviours and number of steps measured using IceQube® accelerometers. Here we show that day affected cattle's preference for pasture versus feedlot environments, with choice alternating between consecutive days (P < 0.001), and cattle also exhibited a preference for pasture at night (P = 0.04). Although the paddock environment was preferred at all pad scores, increasing mud level did not significantly influence the preference of cattle for either environment (P = 0.39), and it is likely that both environments contained rewarding stimuli. There was a significant interaction between pad score and location for lying behaviours and number of steps taken (all P < 0.001), with the highest pad score being associated with reductions in these behaviours within the feedlot. Evidence of a rebound effect for lying behaviours in the paddock for this pad score indicates that high levels of mud may negatively impact welfare when no alternative space to lie is provided.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.254, p. 1-10
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: The Netherlands
ISSN: 1872-9045
0168-1591
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300302 Animal management
300306 Animal welfare
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100401 Beef cattle
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/IncreasingDicksonCampbellMonkColditzLee2022JournalArticle.htmPublished version164.28 kBHTMLView/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons