Starch digestion rates in multiple samples of commonly used feed grains in diets for broiler chickens

Title
Starch digestion rates in multiple samples of commonly used feed grains in diets for broiler chickens
Publication Date
2021-06
Author(s)
Selle, Peter H
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8647-8448
Email: amoss22@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:amoss22
Moss, Amy F
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8647-8448
Email: amoss22@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:amoss22
Khoddami, Ali
Chrystal, Peter V
Liu, Sonia Yun
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Zhongguo Xumu Shouyi Xuehui,Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine
Place of publication
China
DOI
10.1016/j.aninu.2020.12.006
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/57951
Abstract

In this study the starch digestion rates in broiler chickens from 18 samples of 5 commonly used feed grains (sorghum, wheat, maize, barley, triticale) were determined. The methodology to determine starch digestion rates in poultry is detailed herein. Starch digestion rates were not significantly different (P = 0.128) across the 18 feed grains, which reflects the wide variations that were observed within a given feedstuff. Nevertheless, starch digestion rates in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets were significantly more rapid by 56.0% (0.117 versus 0.075 min-1; P = 0.012) than their sorghum-based counterparts on the basis of a pair-wise comparison. In descending order, the following starch digestion rates were observed: wheat (0.117 min-1 ), barley (0.104 min-1 ), triticale (0.093 min-1 ), maize (0.086 min-1 ), sorghum (0.075 min-1 ). The implications of these findings are discussed as they almost certainly have implications for poultry nutrition and the development of reduced crude protein diets for broiler chickens.

Link
Citation
Animal Nutrition, 7(2), p. 450-459
ISSN
2405-6383
2405-6545
Start page
450
End page
459
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/StarchSelleMoss2021JournalArticle.pdf 411.873 KB application/pdf Published Version View document