Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57874
Title: Quantifying the climate change effects of bioenergy systems: Comparison of 15 impact assessment methods
Contributor(s): Brandao, Miguel (author); Kirschbaum, Miko U F (author); Cowie, Annette L  (author); Hjuler, Susanne Vedel (author)
Publication Date: 2019-05
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12593
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57874
Abstract: 

Ongoing concern over climate change has led to interest in replacing fossil energy with bioenergy. There are different approaches to quantitatively estimate the climate change effects of bioenergy systems. In the present work, we have focused on a range of published impact assessment methods that vary due to conceptual differences in the treatment of biogenic carbon fluxes, the type of climate change impacts they address and differences in time horizon and time preference. Specifically, this paper reviews fifteen different methods and applies these to three hypothetical bioenergy case studies: (a) woody biomass grown on previously forested land" (b) woody biomass grown on previous pasture land" and (b) annual energy crop grown on previously cropped land. Our analysis shows that the choice of method can have an important influence on the quantification of climate change effects of bioenergy, particularly when a mature forest is converted to bioenergy use as it involves a substantial reduction in biomass carbon stocks. Results are more uniform in other case studies. In general, results are more sensitive to specific impact assessment methods when they involve both emissions and removals at different points in time, such as for forest bioenergy, but have a much smaller influence on agricultural bioenergy systems grown on land previously used for pasture or annual cropping. The development of effective policies for climate change mitigation through renewable energy use requires consistent and accurate approaches to identification of bioenergy systems that can result in climate change mitigation. The use of different methods for the same purpose: estimating the climate change effects of bioenergy systems, can lead to confusing and contradictory conclusions. A full interpretation of the results generated with different methods must be based on an understanding that the different methods focus on different aspects of climate change and represent different time preferences.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, 11(5), p. 727-743
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1757-1707
1757-1693
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 4101 Climate change impacts and adaptation
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: TBD
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/QuantifyingCowie2019JournalArticle.pdfPublished version710.21 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

48
checked on Jul 20, 2024

Page view(s)

218
checked on Jul 21, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on Jul 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons