Climate change mitigation potential of summer cowpea cover crops in Southern Australian cropping systems is limited

Title
Climate change mitigation potential of summer cowpea cover crops in Southern Australian cropping systems is limited
Publication Date
2022-11-01
Author(s)
Simmons, A T
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-4945
Email: asimmo31@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:asimmo31
Liu, D L
Cowie, A L
Badgery, W B
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Place of publication
The Netherlands
DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108116
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/57822
Abstract

Sequestering atmospheric carbon in soils is considered a key climate change mitigation strategy and including cover crops into cropping systems is commonly promoted as a management change that can increase soil organic carbon (SOC). Projecting SOC changes under climate change when cover crops are integrated into a cropping system is important because climate is a key driver of SOC dynamics and projected changes in climate are uncertain. Further, projecting SOC changes can provide landholders with information on the risk associated with the use of cover crops to generate carbon credits considering the inherent uncertainty in SOC changes under a changing climate. The Agricultural Production SIMulator was used to simulate SOC and yields of a typical crop rotation, with and without a cow pea cover crop, at 204 sites in the Riverina region of Southern Australia. Sowing cover crops reduced crop yields and increased SOC relative to the crop rotation without cover crops. GHG emissions associated with indirect land use change due to reduced crop yields and N2O emissions from the cover crop meant that sowing cover crops was unlikely to provide climate change mitigation. The number of carbon credits generated by participating in the soil carbon method of the Australian government’s emissions reduction program varied greatly across the region with some sites not generating any credits. The implications of these results are discussed with respect to climate change mitigation and the risk of entering a SOC trading program when costs of compliance are high and the ability to generate carbon credits is uncertain.

Link
Citation
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, v.339, p. 1-11
ISSN
1873-2305
0167-8809
Start page
1
End page
11

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink