Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57660
Title: Editorial: Adaptation strategies to climate change impacts on food systems in Asia: greater efforts toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Contributor(s): Tsusaka, Takuji W (author); Kristiansen, Paul  (author)orcid ; Ho, Tien D N (author); Chandio, Abbas Ali (author)
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1284383
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57660
Abstract: 

Climate change and its impact have been a major theme in the global economic discourse, posting significant challenges to agricultural production and associated systems (Shahzad et al., 2021). The agricultural sector is particularly vulnerable to climate dynamics as it directly depends on natural resources and is exposed to seasonal meteorological events (van Oort and Zwart, 2018; Abbas and Mayo, 2021). The unfavorable impacts of global warming and unpredictable climatic events have had detrimental effects on the productivity, efficiency, and resilience of important agricultural systems (Otsuka and Fan, 2021).

These concerns are particularly pronounced in the Asian region, where agrarian pursuits constitute the cornerstone of their large and rapidly growing economies and the livelihoods of a substantial proportion of the populace. Changing weather induces pest and disease outbreaks, causing crop failures (Masud et al.). Heat stresses on crops and livestock reduce productivity, while floods and droughts cause yield losses (Farhad et al.; Wang et al.). In particular, climate change hotspots are frequently reported in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, China, and Vietnam in association with paddy- and wheat-based production systems (Ho et al., 2022; Chandrasiri et al., 2023). In this light, farming communities and associated stakeholders have been exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, with the overarching goal of maintaining the yield of food crops (Gorst et al., 2018; Abegunde et al., 2019).

Although farmers have embraced an array of strategies in response to climatic stresses, the effective adoption of suitable practices has not consistently been realized due to contextual differences or limitations in adaptive capacity (Cradock-Henry et al., 2020). The agrarian transformation in the face of climatic challenges holds a direct bearing on the achievement of several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly No Poverty (SDG1), Zero Hunger (SDG 2), and Climate Action (SDG 13) (UNDP, 2020). This adaptive process resonates closely with certain objectives under Gender Equality (SDG 5), Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8), Responsible Consumption and Production (SDG 12), and Life on Land (SDG 15). In practice, achieving these SDGs requires that strategies for adaptation be designed to curtail the loss of productivity, bolster food security, and promote environmental sustainability (Tschakert et al., 2023). To ensure agricultural sustainability, there is an imperative to minimize the dependence on external and synthetic inputs in the agricultural production processes for both staple commodities and high-value crops (Tsusaka and Otsuka, 2013; Lipper et al., 2018; Deguine et al., 2023).

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v.7, p. 1-3
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2571-581X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300210 Sustainable agricultural development
300202 Agricultural land management
440407 Socio-economic development
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 260199 Environmentally sustainable plant production not elsewhere classified
190101 Climate change adaptation measures (excl. ecosystem)
280101 Expanding knowledge in the agricultural, food and veterinary sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C4 Letter of Note
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/EditorialAdaptationKristiansen2023JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version106.83 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 30, 2024

Page view(s)

568
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Download(s)

112
checked on Dec 1, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons