Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57569
Title: | Specialist Sentencing Courts for Indigenous Offenders |
Contributor(s): | Long, Simon William Campbell (author); Perry, Mark (supervisor) ; Howard, Tanya (supervisor) ; Edgely, Michelle (supervisor) |
Conferred Date: | 2021-03-02 |
Copyright Date: | 2020-11 |
Thesis Restriction Date until: | 2023-03-02 |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57569 |
Abstract: | | Indigenous Offenders in Australia, along with many other jurisdictions, are heavily over represented in the criminal justice system. As a result, specialist 'Aborginal courts' have developed both as a response to this over-representation and as a way to give the indigenous community a 'voice in the sentencing process'. Since 1999, every Australian jurisdiction ( save for Tasmanaia) has introduced their own form of specialist sentencing court for indigenous Offenders. Each has its own particular story of how and why their own versions of Aborginal courts came to fruition and to what extent indigenous people were involved in their development. there have neverthless been a limited number of studies that explore this initial development" indeed few have adopted a national perspective, with the exciting literature restricted to particular juristications. This paper thus reviews the general history of such courts in Australia and other juristications, along with their specific development in each state and Territory and the extent to wich indigenous people were involved in order to investigate a hypothesis that this involvement is casually related to the extent to which some courts can be said to have met their objectives. It also analyses and compares the different models in each jurisdication, identifies what they have in common, emphasises their diverse and localised nature and comments on their respective success or failures according to a number of measures. In doing so, it finds a nexus between the prevalence of a number of common factors and those jurisdications considered a success, likewise with those considered a failure or abondoned altogather.
Publication Type: | Thesis Masters Research |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 180102 Access to Justice 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure 180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems) |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 480501 Access to justice 480503 Criminal procedure 480504 Legal institutions (incl. courts and justice systems) |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 940102 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Development and Welfare 940116 Social Class and Inequalities 940403 Criminal Justice |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 210199 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community services not elsewhere classified 230112 Social class and inequalities 230403 Criminal justice 210102 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander development and wellbeing |
HERDC Category Description: | T1 Thesis - Masters Degree by Research |
Description: | | Please contact rune@une.edu.au if you require access to this thesis for the purpose of research or study.
Appears in Collections: | School of Law Thesis Masters Research
|
Files in This Item:
3 files
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
Show full item record
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.