Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57132
Title: Making time for tea in the public sector: Natural resource management agencies as learning organisations
Contributor(s): Dickson, Katrina Lynne  (author)orcid ; Bartel, Robyn  (supervisor)orcid ; Alter, Theodore  (supervisor); Ballard, Guy  (supervisor)orcid 
Conferred Date: 2020-07-24
Copyright Date: 2020-03
Thesis Restriction Date until: 2030-07-24
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57132
Abstract: 

The capacity of the Earth’s systems to continue to support life, as we know it, is declining. Continuous learning is required for natural resource management (NRM) agencies to respond flexibly and adaptively to complex and growing social-ecological challenges. How to embed continuous learning in NRM, however, remains under-researched despite the critical role the public sector plays in local, regional, national and global well-being. The aim of this research is to contribute theoretical and practical insights into the factors necessary for NRM agency work units to embed organisational learning and become learning organisations. It identifies the important features of a learning organisation, the enablers of and barriers to organisational learning in NRM agency work units, and how organisational learning may be assessed in an NRM work unit in order to guide its development as a learning organisation.

Two qualitative case studies utilising semi-structured interviews, observation and document analysis, were conducted in NRM agency work units in South Africa, the first selected as an exemplar of organisational learning and the second for additional data and potential comparison. Analysis of the data confirmed the first work unit was a learning organisation, with features including interactive informal learning and regular double-loop learning. Three key enablers were identified: organisational learning mechanisms, which are regular informal or formal learning activities; human-centred leadership that balances adaptive and administrative needs; and a supportive learning environment characterised by psychological safety, collaboration, experimentalism, systems-thinking, and affective commitment. Barriers to organisational learning, evident in the second work unit, where the features of a learning organisation were absent, included command and control leadership, risk aversion, micromanagement, reductionist thinking, mistrust, and low psychological safety.

Analysis of the empirical data yielded concepts and insights that have been used to develop and extend existing theory with potential for broad-ranging practical application. The findings and relevant literature were used to create and field test an assessment instrument to ‘Test Our Organisation Learning’ (TOOL), designed to guide the development of NRM agency work units as learning organisations. Recommendations for further work include conducting additional case studies, further field-testing of the TOOL, and research into the success factors for ‘cultural islands of learning’, and the ideal organisational learning mechanisms to use in different contexts.

Publication Type: Thesis Doctoral
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410406 Natural resource management
440708 Public administration
440704 Environment policy
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 230405 Law reform
HERDC Category Description: T2 Thesis - Doctorate by Research
Description: Please contact rune@une.edu.au if you require access to this thesis for the purpose of research or study.
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental and Rural Science
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
School of Law
Thesis Doctoral

Files in This Item:
4 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.