Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57108
Title: Toward a standardized methodology for sampling dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the Neotropics: A critical review
Contributor(s): Mora-Aguilar, Eder F (author); Arriaga-Jimenez, Alfonsina  (author)orcid ; Correa, Cesar M A (author); Giovani da Silva, Pedro (author); Korasaki, Vanesca (author); Lopez-Bedoya, Pablo A (author); Isabel Medina Hernandez, Malva (author); Pablo-Cea, Jose D (author); Portela Salomao, Renato (author); Valencia, Gorky (author); Vulinec, Kevina (author); Edwards, Felicity A (author); Edwards, David P (author); Halffter, Gonzalo (author); Ari Noriega, Jorge (author)
Publication Date: 2023-03-02
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1096208
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57108
Abstract: 

Introduction: The standardization of sampling protocols is imperative for robustly studying any taxonomic group. Replicable methods allow the comparison of data between different spatial and temporal studies. In the case of dung beetles, one of the best-studied indicator groups in analyses of environmental disturbance, a wide range of collection methodologies are used, from basic pitfall traps to more complex or complementary methods such as mini-Winkler extractor. Also, different types of attractive baits, sampling effort, durations, and designs are used in dung beetle studies. Variations in methodological approaches are particularly noted in the Neotropics, which may be related to the vast number of biological strategies and behavior of dung beetles that inhabit this region. A lack of methodological unification for the Neotropical region makes a cross-sectional analysis of the information impossible.

Methods: We performed a compilation and analytical review of the existing literature for dung beetle sampling in the Neotropics, discussing the most used methodologies, their advantages and disadvantages, and specific cases in which particular models are more efficient.

Results: Pitfall traps baited with human excrement are the most common sampling method, but there is a wide range of models and variations in the structure of this trap. The complementary effect generated by flight interception traps, light traps, and direct collections, particularly within microhabitats, is exciting for the potential of finding new species. Some methodologies, such as mini-Winkler extractor, fogging, or very specific baits, are infrequently used.

Discussion: There was a lack of inclusion of spatial and temporal variation among studies. Therefore, it is necessary to consider broader sampling windows, which include different spatial scales, seasons, and years. Finally, we propose a standard protocol for sampling dung beetles in the Neotropics, depending on each objective, and including a basic methodology for obtaining complete local inventories.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, v.11, p. 1-16
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2296-701X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 060808 Invertebrate Biology
060208 Terrestrial Ecology
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310913 Invertebrate biology
310308 Terrestrial ecology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180606 Terrestrial biodiversity
280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1096208/full
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/TowardArriagaJimenez2023JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version3.54 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons