Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57106
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, Terence Zimazileen
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Natalieen
dc.contributor.authorWalkden-Brown, Stephenen
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T04:55:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-02T04:55:21Z-
dc.date.created2020-08-
dc.date.issued2020-11-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57106-
dc.descriptionPlease contact rune@une.edu.au if you require access to this thesis for the purpose of research or study.en
dc.description.abstract<p>Free-range laying hens are perceived by consumers to live a more “natural” and “happier” life, with improved welfare compared to caged hens. However, the impact of free-range housing systems on bird health and welfare is poorly understood. Thus, the aim of this thesis was to provide evidence on how hens utilise the range and shed resources in an Australian free-range housing system, and examine the impact of this on bird health and behaviour. The research presented involved monitoring flock dynamics and measuring hen performance, with the aim of better understanding the nutrient requirements of free-range hens.</p> <p>In order to quantify individual hen usage of the range and aviary system, a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) system was custom built by the University of New England to track 18 000 hens throughout the shed, both in the aviary system and on the outdoor range, in a commercial free-range farm. This RFID system technique was validated, achieving a precision of 90.0%, accuracy of 87.7% and specificity of 86.4%. The data produced allowed for individual hen’s occupancy at various zones to be determined, including duration of time spent at each of the four locations. Flock body weight was also assessed, as an indicator of bird health status. According to individual hen range use, flock sub-populations were identified and production performance and health of these sub-populations was investigated; these sub-populations were classified as ‘stayers’ and ‘rangers’, identified as hens that either spent the majority of their time in the shed or on the outdoor range, respectively. The results showed that these sub-populations clearly have different behaviours at different ages, impacting their mortality, health and welfare. Hens that were ‘rangers’ during early lay (18-21 weeks of age) were 3 times more likely to survive and had 10% higher egg production during early lay compared to hens that preferred to stay in the shed, but there was no difference on overall production over the life of the flock. The effect of range use on egg quality and bone health was also investigated, but no statistically significant effects were identified.</p> <p>In conclusion, this thesis demonstrates the successful application of modern tracking technology and machine learning to collect and utilise large data sets to accurately characterise behaviour, resource use, and resulting dynamics, of free-range hens. These methods provide powerful tools for evidence-based decision-making regarding housing design and management procedures, to achieve desired performance and welfare outcomes. One such advantage is that it may enable optimised use of feed resources to ensure the nutrient requirements of all sub-populations are achieved. </p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of New England-
dc.relation.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57107en
dc.titleCharacterising and Managing Commercial Free-Range Laying Hen Sub-Populationsen
dc.typeThesis Doctoralen
local.contributor.firstnameTerence Zimazileen
local.contributor.firstnameIsabelleen
local.contributor.firstnameNatalieen
local.contributor.firstnameStephenen
local.hos.emailers-sabl@une.edu.auen
local.thesis.passedPasseden
local.thesis.degreelevelDoctoralen
local.thesis.degreenameDoctor of Philosophy - PhDen
local.contributor.grantorUniversity of New England-
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailtsiband2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnmorga20@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswalkden@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryT2en
local.access.restrictedto2023-11-05en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeArmidale, Australia-
local.contributor.lastnameSibandaen
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
local.contributor.lastnameMorganen
local.contributor.lastnameWalkden-Brownen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tsiband2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nmorga20en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swalkdenen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0056-8419en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9663-2365en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0638-5533en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.profile.rolesupervisoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/57106en
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.thesis.bypublicationYesen
local.title.maintitleCharacterising and Managing Commercial Free-Range Laying Hen Sub-Populationsen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis research was conducted within the Poultry CRC, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program. We thank the Australian Eggs for providing financial support under sub-project 1UN151.en
local.output.categorydescriptionT2 Thesis - Doctorate by Researchen
local.relation.doi10.1080/00071668.2019.1686123en
local.relation.doi10.1399/eps.2020.295en
local.relation.doi10.3390/ani10050855en
local.relation.doi10.3390/ani10060991en
local.relation.doi10.3390/ani10101911en
local.relation.doi10.1111/jpn.13145en
local.relation.doi10.1399 / eps.2020.308en
local.relation.doi10.1016/j.aninu.2019.12.003en
local.relation.doi10.3382/ps/pez487en
local.relation.doi10.1071/AN19256en
local.relation.doi10.1080/00071668.2020.1759786en
local.relation.doi10.3390/ani10091706en
local.access.yearsrestricted3en
local.school.graduationSchool of Environmental & Rural Scienceen
local.thesis.borndigitalYes-
local.search.authorSibanda, Terence Zimazileen
local.search.supervisorRuhnke, Isabelleen
local.search.supervisorMorgan, Natalieen
local.search.supervisorWalkden-Brown, Stephenen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.conferred2020-
local.subject.for2020300210 Sustainable agricultural developmenten
local.subject.for2020300302 Animal managementen
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
local.subject.seo2020100601 Eggsen
local.subject.seo2020100699 Primary products from animals not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental and Rural Science
Thesis Doctoral
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.