Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5671
Title: | Who has the right to care, who has the right to judge? | Contributor(s): | Campbell, Steven (author) | Publication Date: | 2004 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5671 | Abstract: | In 1997, I was shocked to get comments on an editorial I wrote. The editorial had sought to show that clinical judgement was not the sole province of the children's nurse but was shared with, particularly, the parent and prime carers. My shock was that children's nurses should be telling me that they reserved that right and could be the only ones who had skills in clinical judgement. My career has moved on and my role, while encompassing paediatrics, is also generic in nature, and it's easier to see why some generalist colleagues might perceive children's nurses to have a limited outlook when such attitudes to the ownership of clinical judgement prevail. In some respects, the development of advanced roles in children's nursing may be held back under such circumstances. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Neonatal, Paediatric and Child Health Nursing, 7(2), p. 2-4 | Publisher: | Cambridge Publishing | Place of Publication: | Australia | ISSN: | 1441-6638 | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 111704 Community Child Health 111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care) |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 920204 Evaluation of Health Outcomes 920210 Nursing 920501 Child Health |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C5 Other Refereed Contribution to a Scholarly Journal | Publisher/associated links: | http://www.npchn.com/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Health |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.