Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/56447
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatford, Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Samuelen
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T02:45:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-31T02:45:27Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationThe Australian Law Journal, 97(10), p. 766-786en
dc.identifier.issn0004-9611en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/56447-
dc.description.abstract<p>In an age where technological personalisation beats privacy, individuals willingly give their data in return for a bespoke experience. Individuals are more likely to share their data when they know there are clear benefits to themselves or society. The opportunity cost in handing over personal data in return for a personalised experience can open the door to privacy breaches and criminal activity. Forming part of personal data is biometric data, which includes facial features, iris and retina, voice, and heartbeat. However, in Australia, a uniform legislated definition of biometric data does not exist. Every day, open sources grow with biometric data. A better understanding of the ways in which biometric data can be used and a best practice definition is key. This essay seeks to highlight, analyse, and ultimately resolve the legal and policy risks of not having a legislated definition of biometric data for privacy purposes.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLawbook Coen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Australian Law Journalen
dc.titleI know who you are: The need for a uniform Australian definition of biometric dataen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
local.contributor.firstnameElizabethen
local.contributor.firstnameSamuelen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailswhite88@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.identifier.runningnumber929en
local.format.startpage766en
local.format.endpage786en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume97en
local.identifier.issue10en
local.title.subtitleThe need for a uniform Australian definition of biometric dataen
local.contributor.lastnameWatforden
local.contributor.lastnameWhiteen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swhite88en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0838-5649en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/56447en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleI know who you areen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWatford, Elizabethen
local.search.authorWhite, Samuelen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2023-
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/a1671900-b372-43e7-8503-fd05c446f964en
local.subject.for2020480705 Military law and justiceen
local.subject.seo2020230403 Criminal justiceen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Law
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

264
checked on Jan 28, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Jan 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.