Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5600
Title: Searching for non-indigenous species: rapidly delimiting the invasion boundary
Contributor(s): Leung, Brian (author); Cacho, Oscar Jose (author)orcid ; Spring, D (author)
Publication Date: 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00653.x
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5600
Abstract: 'Aim' At first detection, little information is typically known about an invader's characteristics, true arrival date or spatial extent. Yet, before management options such as control or eradication can be considered, we need to know where a nuisance species has already spread. This is particularly difficult because of stochastic processes. Here, we develop an approach that requires little a 'priori' information, yet accurately delimits the range of a biological invader. 'Location' We used a simulated landscape, subjected to stochasticity inherent in establishment and spread, to test novel theory for delimiting locally spreading populations. 'Methods' We distinguish three stages to identify the boundary of an invasion, which we term Approach, Decline, Delimit (ADD). Our ADD algorithm uses general characteristics of the invasion pattern, obtained during a search for occupied sites, in combination with sampling and probability theory to delimit the invasion. We compare ADD against four naïve delimitation strategies, for long and normal dispersal kernels. 'Results' Our results illustrate the potential difficulty in delimiting invasions. Naïve strategies, such as stopping when the invader is absent, typically failed to properly delimit the invasion. In contrast, ADD operated relatively efficiently, and was robust to habitat heterogeneity and knowledge of the true epicentre, but was sensitive to the sparseness of the invasion. For long-distance dispersal kernels, ADD had 80% accurate delimitations when 'c'. 5% or more of the cells were occupied within the invasion boundary; for normal dispersal kernels, ADD had 95% accurate delimitations when 'c'. 2.5% or more of the cells were occupied. 'Main conclusions' There is virtually no existing theory for delimiting invasions. ADD is efficient and accurate, even with unknown time of invasion, unknown dispersal kernels, stochastic establishment dynamics and spatial heterogeneity, except for very low invasion densities.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Diversity and Distributions, 16(3), p. 451-460
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Place of Publication: Oxford, UK
ISSN: 1472-4642
1366-9516
Field of Research (FOR): 050103 Invasive Species Ecology
010404 Probability Theory
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 447
Views: 452
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

70
checked on Jan 12, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.